Search for: "New York v. United States Department of Justice"
Results 841 - 860
of 2,577
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2017, 4:29 am
United States, in which the court will decide next term whether the Fourth Amendment requires that the government obtain a warrant for historical records showing where a cell phone connects with towers, observing that the case calls on the justices to “puzzle over the implications of an 18th-century rule for a distinctly 21st-century reality. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 4:00 am
“Every action that I and my office have taken for the last 23 years that I have been privileged to be in the United States Congress has been based on pursuing the best policies for the people of New Jersey and this entire country. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 6:00 am
The news of the two replacement justices, however, did not make national news. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:58 am
The justices held 5-4 in United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 11:15 pm
The Department of Justice has filed, in the U.S. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 8:40 am
Coverage comes from WABC-TV and the New York Daily News. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 5:21 am
” Heather Long for the Washington Post reports that Collins “said Sunday she would not vote for any judge who wanted to end access to abortion in the United States by overturning Roe v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 8:01 am
"An Urgent Plea for Mercy," is the New York Times editorial from the Saturday edition. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 10:35 am
The Department of Justice followed these and other official disclosures with a lengthy white paper in which it both confirmed the existence of the surveillance program and also offered legal justification of the intercepts. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 3:57 am
New York, “it seems likely the 2020 census will contain a question about citizenship. [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 7:06 am
We did it,” Representative Carolyn Maloney of New York, a longtime E.R.A. proponent, told me. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 11:31 am
The justices did not schedule New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
We believe that at least five Justices will rule that the arbitrators should not, in the face of the agreements' silence, have imposed class arbitration where, as here, there is no basis in the Federal Arbitration Act, New York state law or federal maritime law for implying consent to class arbitration. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
While Justice Thomas has cast some doubt on this form of analysis in his opinion in Reed v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:14 am
Section 403(d) would require states to report a description of their laws to the Department of Justice. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 9:30 am
Circuit’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 3:42 am
In the United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 3:42 am
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse suggests that “the chief justice means to leave the door open to abortion regulations that confer no medical benefit while imposing obstacles less drastic — perhaps less ‘substantial’ — than ridding a state of all but one abortion clinic. [read post]
26 May 2009, 7:22 am
For example, In United States v. [read post]
