Search for: "O’CONNOR V. STATE"
Results 841 - 860
of 1,822
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2017, 6:58 am
” Chief Justice O’Connor, to the prosecutor. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 7:21 am
Maybe Bikkannavar has signed a form limiting or entirely waiving his Fourth Amendment rights in the phone, which could matter under O’Connor v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 7:58 am
’ Justice O’Connor went on to cite other decisions like Meyer v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 7:58 am
’ Justice O’Connor went on to cite other decisions like Meyer v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:03 am
Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 10:58 am
My good friend Carl Varnedoe will be arguing for the Plaintiff and my good friend Pat O’Connor will be arguing for the City of Richmond. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 10:58 am
My good friend Carl Varnedoe will be arguing for the Plaintiff and my good friend Pat O’Connor will be arguing for the City of Richmond. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 7:22 am
Greenberger and Nancy Duff Campbell, Co-Presidents of the National Women’s Law Center, echoed Feinstein’s concerns about Roe v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 7:39 am
Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Justices Pfeifer, O’Neill, Kennedy and French No: Chief Justice O’Connor, and Justices Lanzinger and O’Donnell Key Precedent R.C. 2711.10(D) (“In any of the following cases, the court of common pleas shall make an order vacating the award upon the application of any party to the arbitration if . . . [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 5:29 pm
I’ve known Neil Gorsuch for 20+ years, when he was co-clerks with my brother Eugene: he was a Byron White & Anthony Kennedy clerk in 1993-94, the same year that Eugene clerked for O’Connor. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 7:03 am
Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Chief Justice O’Connor, and Justices Pfeifer, Lanzinger, O’Neill, and French. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 6:23 am
State v. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 7:29 am
Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Chief Justice O’Connor, and Justices Pfeifer, Lanzinger, Kennedy, and O’Neill. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 7:17 am
In a 4-3 opinion written by Justice Lanzinger, joined by Justices O’Neill, Pfeifer, and Chief Justice O’Connor, the court held that it is unconstitutional to use a juvenile adjudication as the equivalent of an adult conviction to enhance a penalty for a later crime. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 6:11 am
Is the question here substantial compliance, asked Chief Justice O’Connor? [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 7:11 am
In a 5-2 opinion written by Chief Justice O’Connor, the court held the trial judge in this case properly refused to give a post-market failure to warn jury instruction, as the evidence did not warrant it. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
It found (contrary to the Supreme Court’s later ruling in Walker v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:29 am
State v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 6:20 am
But serious constitutional federalists should be opposing Raich, in line with the powerful dissenting opinions by Justice Clarence Thomas and Sandra Day O’Connor, not exploiting it to impose federal prohibition on unwilling states. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 8:26 am
Joining the majority opinion were Chief Justice O’Connor and Justices Pfeifer and O’Neill. [read post]
