Search for: "Owings v. Respondent" Results 841 - 860 of 2,317
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2017, 3:32 pm by Wolfgang Demino
In late 2013, WPR, on behalf of its client NCO, filed suits in Illinois state court seeking repayment of student debt owed by Marquez, Garriga, and Russell. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 9:00 am by Eric Goldman
Virtually every waking hour of every day, we use online services that owe their existence to Section 230’s protections. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
Victory Motors (Abbotsford) Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 6:58 am by Joy Waltemath
And the dispatcher produced sufficient evidence of how much overtime she was owed: five minutes each shift, per the county’s written policy. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm by Wolfgang Demino
• (d) all common law claims, based upon contract, tort, fraud, or other intentional torts;• (e) all claims based upon a violation of any state or federal constitution, statute, or regulation;• (f) all claims asserted by us against you, including claims for money damages to collect any sum we claim you owe us; . . . [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am by MOTP
" The Parkers further alleged that IB owed them, as trust beneficiaries, a duty of fair dealing, which it breached by violating certain FINRA rules.[2] Specifically, IB failed to use "reasonable diligence" in the opening and maintenance of their trust account; know the "essential facts" concerning the trust, as its customer; "have a reasonable basis to believe that a recommended transaction or investment strategy involving a security or securities [was]… [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 7:31 am by JB
This formula has proved inadequate to respond to the social problems of the present, no matter how strong the party seems at present. [read post]
27 Aug 2017, 10:55 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
The 1961 Act, therefore, does not apply to the arbitration agreement between the appellant and the first respondent. [read post]
26 Aug 2017, 4:43 pm by Bernie Burk
  Nothing in the pardon prospectively immunizes Arpaio for anything he might do in the future—though his days of violating the civil rights of others under color of state law are probably over as a practical matter owing to his departure from office; if he discriminates against or falsely imprisons Latinos now, it will probably be as a private citizen. [read post]