Search for: "PATRICK v. STATE"
Results 841 - 860
of 2,809
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2014, 5:13 pm
But in Fifield v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 5:13 pm
But in Fifield v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 8:00 am
” Patrick Joseph Carney v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 12:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 4:15 am
On Monday, the Supreme Court of the United States declined to hear the case of Personal Audio v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 1:14 pm
Attorney for the Northern District Patrick Fitzgerald Indctment in the Matter of United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 9:24 am
To end its term, the Supreme Court today issued its long awaited opinion in Ricci v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 12:39 pm
Reporting on today's COA decision in the case of Indiana High School Athletic Association, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:58 am
The District Court Judge then explained that “Wolff challenges both the government's initial acquisition of his electronic devices and the lawfulness of the two state warrants that the government obtained to search them. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:32 am
Justin Riemer is Chief Counsel of the Republican National Committee, which filed an amicus brief in support of the state in Rucho v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 1:21 pm
The case, McDonald v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 12:30 am
Patrick Huston, made its international way to my desk. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 12:30 am
Patrick Huston, made its international way to my desk. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:51 am
Wonderbread 5 v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:55 am
The respondents are Ana Matosantos (California’s Director of Finance), state Controller John Chiang, and Alameda County Auditor-Controller Patrick O’Connel (as representative of the class of county auditor-controllers). [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
The books are Patrick J. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 10:08 am
On the other hand, given the way Risk handled coverage of the "sovereign immunity issue" in Sistrunk v United States of America I am not at all surprised. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 3:53 am
Case Name: Pendleton v. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 3:53 am
Case Name: Pendleton v. [read post]
