Search for: "Parcell v. United States"
Results 841 - 860
of 925
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2009, 3:56 am
United Parcel Service [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 9:26 am
Army Corps of Engineers (2008) 543 F.3d 586, the United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit held that the U.S. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 12:07 pm
By Glen Hansen In Arcadia Development Co. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 6:15 am
The property at issue is a 17 acre parcel previously owned by the United States and used as an army reserve facility. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 6:15 am
The property at issue is a 17 acre parcel previously owned by the United States and used as an army reserve facility. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 6:28 pm
See United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 7:56 am
Bur., Inc. v United Parcel Serv., Inc., 35 AD3d 817). [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 8:08 pm
By Cori Badgley In Gray v. [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 9:10 am
Absent a specific request for coverage not already in a client's policy, or the existence of a special relationship with the client, an insurance agent or broker has no continuing duty to advise, guide or direct a client to obtain additional coverage (see Murphy v Kuhn, supra; JKT Construction v United States Liab. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 12:17 am
Strang v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 11:10 pm
Carcieri, the state itself, and the town of Charlestown — were united in the claim that the federal government has no authority to do that for the Narragansetts. [read post]
26 Oct 2008, 5:34 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 7:07 pm
By Glen Hansen In Zanelli v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
A southern state, right? [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 6:44 am
In United States v. 4.85 Acres of Land, No. 07-35310 (Sep. 29, 2008), the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that the trial court should not have refused to admit evidence of sales at properties nearby the property taken, even though the sales occurred after the taking. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 10:18 am
In United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 7:59 pm
First, a possible solution is the application of the Coase Theorem, which is well-known to lawyers through its application in United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 8:04 pm
The Secretary downplayed the significance of the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 9:43 pm
Ctr. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 9:20 pm
See United States Football Leaguev. [read post]
