Search for: "People v Childs"
Results 841 - 860
of 7,015
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2009, 12:10 am
And the entire system of law turns upon it.Imagine that this experience serves to provide the basis for people you don't know to force your child to remove all her clothing and expose her genitals.Imagine that this experience allows people you don't know to take this action because, in their absolute and sole discretion, it seemed like a good idea at the moment. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 6:05 pm
That is exactly what is alleged in Walter Mcleroy v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 7:54 am
Hence you lose.The lesson for the day is not to wait to sue dead people. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 9:22 am
Williams v The London Borough of Hackney [2018] UKSC 37 was about the opposite scenario; where a local authority wanted to accommodate but the parents wanted the children back. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:47 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)Bajwa & Ors, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 1093 (06 May 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division)TG, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Lambeth [2011] EWCA Civ 526 (06 May 2011) C (A Child), Re [2011] EWCA Civ 521 (06 May 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)Potts v Densley & Anor [2011] EWHC 1144 (QB) (06 May 2011) Bacon v Automattic Inc & Ors [2011] EWHC 1072 (QB) (06 May 2011)High Court (Chancery… [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 2:21 pm
The post Utah v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 6:06 am
The Michigan Court of Appeals ruled in a 2004 published case (People v Adams) that a defendant cannot assert a defense at trial of his or her, "inability to pay" the court-ordered child support.Accordingly, in the Likine case, the Attorney General requested trial judge John McDonald to preclude Likine from introducing any of the above facts regarding her disability and resulting lack of income from jury consideration. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 9:57 am
In Meyer v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 7:26 am
A.H. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 1:37 pm
There, the person accused was convicted of defrauding different people than the indictment alleged he defrauded. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 5:31 am
La. 1986) (no privacy expectation for conversation "broadcast by radio in all directions to be overheard by countless people"); State v. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 5:30 am
Strahan and Isaacson v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 10:06 am
In 1979, Kramer v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 4:15 am
The complaint in Foote v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 11:09 am
(Indian Child Welfare Act - Juvenile Dependency Appeals)People in Interest of A.B. [read post]
28 May 2020, 12:19 pm
Department of Child Safety, T.C., J.C., Navajo Nation (Indian Child Welfare Act) U.S. [read post]
25 Aug 2007, 1:53 pm
Commonwealth v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 2:34 pm
" Hence you're not eligible for asylum even if the applicant can demonstrate that that'll happen to her (or her child) if she's deported.Needless to say, that ain't how Judge McKeown views it. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 11:25 am
Debonneville v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 9:25 am
” Pate v. [read post]
