Search for: "People v Davis" Results 841 - 860 of 2,043
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  If yes, the law is little changed as a practical matter, and the same people will be convicted, by and large. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 5:53 am by Dan Carvajal
Laws by their very nature divide people into different categories and subject them to differing treatment, but not all laws violate the Equal Protection Clause. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 4:55 am by Russ Bensing
  The court then shifted to reliance on the US Supreme Court’s subsequent decision in Davis v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-8996, Davis v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 This claim is, of course, deeply counterintuitive, and it would be very awkward, to say the least, for the Supreme Court to explain to the American people that Section 3 doesn’t apply to someone who’s been President because although that person held an “office,” it wasn’t an office “of the United States. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 9:42 pm by Richard D. Friedman
Here are some preliminary observations on the opinions in Michigan v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 9:49 am by J
Most people would say that they can’t: see, e.g. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 9:49 am by J
Most people would say that they can’t: see, e.g. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:06 am by dferriero
Bush Presidential Library and MuseumRobert Holzweiss, PhD., Deputy Director, the George Bush Presidential Library and MuseumProfessor Alston V. [read post]