Search for: "People v Guess"
Results 841 - 860
of 3,529
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2019, 7:52 am
Mazola oil, or Muir Glen v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 1:43 pm
Look at expected uses v. unexpected uses? [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:16 am
Koh's ruling in FTC v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 11:13 am
” That said, after a full-bore takedown of the Trump v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 7:39 pm
In Thacker v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 5:40 am
" Welp, I guess it was. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:42 pm
I think the court is definitely going to remind people that it’s important to redact a PDF, not just use black highlighting in the document, or people can still read everything. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 8:30 am
[You might also read my earlier post on the subject, Anti-Libel Injunctions and the Criminal Libel Connection and The First Amendment and Criminal Libel Law; or you can read the whole article in PDF.] [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 8:30 am
I'm continuing to serialize my forthcoming Penn Law Review article on Anti-Libel Injunctions. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 1:41 pm
The Q is not how to fix a broken whackamole system but how do platforms discharge their duties based on the risk they introduce, not one size fits all [just two sizes, I guess].Stan Adams Center for Democracy & Technology: Directive provisions are fundamentally problematic and unbalanced v. 512. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:25 am
A State Supreme Court Justice has preliminary enjoined the County of Rockland from imposing an "Emergency Declaration" preventing any unvaccinated children under the age of 18 from entering any "place of public assembly," defined as any place where 10 or more people congregate, including schools.The case is W.D. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 12:01 am
Bianchi v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 1:32 pm
I guess they confirm each other. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 9:24 pm
But it is possible to make some educated guesses. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 10:00 am
If you text the word invite, I‑N‑V‑I‑T‑E, we’ll know about that. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 11:51 am
") points to a site named "me.me" that is--guess what--dedicated to memes. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 10:12 am
In last term’s Sessions v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:03 am
” At Bloomberg, Greg Stohr reports that the “Supreme Court gets a chance to join the fray over Special Counsel Robert Mueller for the first time this week as the justices consider whether to hear an appeal in a mystery case that’s kept people guessing for months” – an appeal “filed by an unidentified foreign government-owned company in a fight over a grand jury subpoena. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
"As to considering hearsay evidence in an administrative hearing, the Appellate Division said that "hearsay is admissible as competent evidence in an administrative proceeding, and if sufficiently relevant and probative may constitute substantial evidence even if contradicted by live testimony on credibility grounds" [see Matter of Watson v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 152 AD3d 1025]. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
"As to considering hearsay evidence in an administrative hearing, the Appellate Division said that "hearsay is admissible as competent evidence in an administrative proceeding, and if sufficiently relevant and probative may constitute substantial evidence even if contradicted by live testimony on credibility grounds" [see Matter of Watson v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 152 AD3d 1025]. [read post]
