Search for: "People v Miranda"
Results 841 - 860
of 911
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2008, 10:46 pm
In the case Brown v. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 7:08 am
State v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986); and 2) any unreasonable application of Miranda v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 5:28 am
People v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Liddell, No. 07-1337 In a prosecution for being a felon in possession of a firearm, denial of a motion to suppress a post-arrest statement made without the warnings required by Miranda is affirmed where the arresting officers' in-custody questioning fell within the public safety exception to Miranda established in New York v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:19 am
Comcast Cable Communications LLC, defendant-respondent
APPELLATE DIVISIONFIRST DEPARTMENTCriminal PracticeConfession 'Sufficiently Attentuated' From Statement Before 'Miranda' Rights Waiver Was Suppressed in Error People v. [read post]
16 Feb 2008, 9:07 am
Anderson v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 8:00 pm
As far as confessions under U.S. law are concerned, I refer to the Fulminante decision (Arizona v. [read post]
27 Jan 2008, 10:14 am
In People v VanPatten, 2007 NY Slip Op 10408, the defendant was convicted after jury trial of Making a Terrroristic Threat in violation of Penal Law 240.20. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
A conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm is affirmed over claims that: 1) a police officer's decision to run a warrant check on him was based on his race, in violation of his Equal Protection rights; 2) the search of his vehicle incident to his arrest violated the Fourth Amendment; and 3) questioning by the police after his arrest violated his Fifth Amendment rights under Miranda. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
On appeal, he raises three arguments: (1) that the police officer's decision to run a warrant check on him was based on his race, violating the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment; (2) that the search of his vehicle incident to his arrest violated the Fourth Amendment; and (3) that the questioning by the police after his arrest violated his Fifth Amendment rights under Miranda v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Upton, No. 07-1456 Conviction and sentence on drug and weapons charges are affirmed over defendant's challenges to: 1) the voluntariness of his Miranda waiver; 2) the admission of a police officer's expert and lay testimony; 3) the district court's denial of certain jury instructions; and 4) his status as an Armed Career Criminal. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 10:03 am
People v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 12:56 am
Hovnanian at Monroe II, Inc.APPELLATE DIVISIONTHIRD DEPARTMENTCriminal PracticeTerroristic Threat Conviction Reversed; Court Erred In Not Suppressing Statements Violating 'Miranda'People v. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 9:55 am
Miranda, Project Director University of Puerto Rico Medical Sciences Campus, Central Administration FILI US Institute P.O. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 9:00 am
For a copy of the Appellate Division’s decision, please use this link: People v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 1:24 pm
In the landmark Miranda v. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 7:43 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 4:06 am
People v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 1:37 am
"
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, October 23, 2007US v. [read post]
