Search for: "People v Person"
Results 841 - 860
of 31,530
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2015, 8:45 am
Such was the case for plaintiff in Hodson v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 9:07 pm
By denying a writ of certiorari in Hardeman v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 10:51 am
Rush Atkinson V of N.Y.U. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 5:22 am
In R v Gul [2013] UKSC 64, an appeal concerning other aspects of the anti-terrorism regime, the Court stated that “detention of the kind provided for in the Schedule represents the possibility of serious invasions of personal liberty”: [64]. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 7:28 am
Lukis v. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 6:17 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit 2007) (internal citations omitted).Plaintiff relies on Productive People, LLC v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 1:13 pm
Since then, it has become one of the fastest selling smartphones for both business and personal use. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 2:43 am
In the case of Kamboj v. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 12:47 pm
State v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:13 am
In Bass v. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 12:41 pm
People v Nimmons, 95 AD3d 1360, 1360-1361, lv denied 19 NY3d 1028; People v Tucker, 91 AD3d 1030, 1031-1032, lv denied 19 NY3d 1002; People v Ham, 67 AD3d 1038, 1039-1040; People v Gray, 30 AD3d 771, 773, lv denied 7 NY3d 848).Mr. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 11:32 am
Carp, People v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 1:35 pm
But the reasonable person standard isn’t as high as you think it is—reasonable people may be trusting. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 11:48 am
Court of Appeals upheld the use of 11 person juries in People v. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Recognizing that some people might be more vulnerable to community stigma because of their religious community membership could well be praised as the governmental "neutrality in the face of religious differences" that Sherbert v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 8:58 am
SSI is generally for disabled children, blind people, disabled elderly persons and those who have not worked enough to have paid in the system to make them eligible for SSDI benefits. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 2:33 am
The result of this invidious doctrine, as formulated in Chan Wing-Siu v The Queen [1985] 1 AC 168, meant that “if two people set out to commit an offence (crime A), and in the course of that joint enterprise, one of them (D1) commits another offence (crime B), the second person (D2) is guilty as an accessory to crime B if he has foreseen the possibility that D1 might act as he did. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 12:36 pm
But are you also guilty of the (much bigger) felony offense of bringing drugs into jail in violation of Penal Code sect. 4573, which states that "Except when otherwise authorized . . . any person who, knowingly brings or sends into, or knowingly assists in bringing into, or sending into, any state prison . . . or into any county . . . jail . . . any controlled substance . . . is guilty of a felony. . . . [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 8:56 am
That many drinks and, personally, I'm out -- way over 0.17. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 12:38 pm
Rearden LLC v. [read post]
