Search for: "People v. Lines" Results 841 - 860 of 12,004
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2015, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
On 5 December 2014, the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights (the “Court”) delivered its ground breaking judgment on freedom of expression in Lohé Issa Konaté v Burkina Faso (Application No 004/2013 [pdf] (available only in French). [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 12:25 pm by David Greene
The through-line of these cases is a critically important principle that sets limits on government’s ability to control the online speech of people who use social media, as well as the social media sites themselves: internet users’ First Amendment rights to speak on social media—whether by posting or commenting—may be infringed by the government if it interferes with content moderation, but will not be infringed by the independent decisions of the platforms… [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 10:54 am
This decision came after the recent Illinois Supreme Court ruling striking down part of the state's gun law as unconstitutional (People v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 2:05 pm by Stephen D. Rosenberg
But there might be a more interesting question to explore, which stems from William Buckley’s famous line that he would rather be governed by the first 100 people in the phone book than the faculty of Harvard. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 4:25 am by Howard Friedman
Affirming the Human Rights Commission's $26,000 damage award, the court said in part:Webber Academy, to its credit, adopted a public policy of welcoming young people of many faiths and cultures, and to exemplify its policy, published photographs of students with turbans and facial hair even though these practices contravened usual school policies.For some reason, it drew the line at Sunni prayer rituals, conducted in private, in a place that was convenient to the school and… [read post]
7 May 2014, 8:36 pm by Paul Horwitz
 The subject has been much on my mind in the last two or three days while reading and commenting on Town of Greece v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 11:46 am by Hayley Tsukayama
Even before the Supreme Court draft decision regarding Roe v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 12:55 pm by Michael Grossman
Here, though, the conduct of the investigating parties was out of line with the rules of their appointment: Using Eckert’s apparent nerves as a pretext for further action, officers then essentially committed to finding drugs “no matter what. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 9:29 am by Nelson Tebbe
It is why the line of cases coming out of Sherbert v. [read post]