Search for: "People v. Poole" Results 841 - 860 of 1,413
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2012, 2:39 pm by Noelle C. Nelson Ph.D.
There is nothing that can replace vigorous discussion of your case’s strengths and weaknesses among a group of people rigorously selected to match your jury pool. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 5:10 pm by The Charge
  Indeed, in the seminal case of Batson v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 5:14 am
(to be continued) - Vinod Kothari & Soma Bagaria [1] In case of Surat Peoples’ Co-Operative Bank v. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 8:51 am by John S. Merculief II
Here’s a quick chronology, as set forth in the relevant court opinion, Stewart v. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 4:42 am by Susan Brenner
Heeb, `many people make a living playing poker and win consistently over time’ whereas `it is impossible to make a living and to win consistently playing casino games such as roulette’ where chance predominates. . . .This fact alone was an independent foundation for his opinion that skill predominates over chance in poker.U.S. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 3:10 pm by Richard Ford
 As compared to earlier affirmative action cases, relatively little is really at stake in Fisher v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 4:45 am by Ryan Flax
Flax Managing Director, Litigation ConsultingA2L Consulting  In last week’s article on the conclusion of the Apple v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 10:00 am by Nat
“Tort deform” laws tied the hands of judge and jury – the only people who see, hear and evaluate the evidence before them in open court. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 6:30 am by Thom Lambert
As those folks remove themselves from the pool of insureds, insurance premiums (reflective of the per capita expected health care costs of the covered population) will rise, leading even more relatively healthy people to exit the pool and thereby exacerbating the “healthy flight” problem. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 11:03 am by Lindsay Griffiths
The questions still remain as to whether people will buy insurance, whether there will be new incentives, either at the federal or state level, if these new incentives will be constitutional, and whether the risk pools will be balanced. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 6:40 am by admin
DON’T send those people to Barstow!!! [read post]