Search for: "People v. Superior Court (Wells)"
Results 841 - 860
of 1,879
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2006, 6:04 am
That argument hasn't flown as well, in part because it requires that girls' educational interests be sacrificed to boys' interests, which, of course, reminds people of pretty standard forms of sex inequality practiced over the centuries. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 3:42 pm
In a February 9, 2011 post I discussed the case of Too Much Media LLC v. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit decided in United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:22 am
In Dugal v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 5:45 am
Argued October 12, 1993 -- Decided May 26, 1994On certification to the Superior Court, Law Division, Middlesex County.Simon Louis Rosenbach, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant (Robert W. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 3:56 am
Seattle and Mattos v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:40 am
Most people understand that if they lose their job, they have a right to receive severance from their employer. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:32 am
This post is a detour from my series on section 3 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Superior Court of Justice and Court of Appeal Working Families decisions (see here and here (SCJ) and here (ONCA)). [read post]
29 Mar 2020, 8:33 pm
In tough times, people pull together. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
Professor Adrian Vermeule agrees with the 1920 progressive consensus that courts should not interfere when legislatures adopt policies that reasonable people think pursue the public good. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 10:41 pm
(E.g., People v. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 5:52 am
The latter can be tough to prove, though the Florida Supreme Court did find in the 1991 case of Ellis v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 1:50 am
I argue that the sex equality interpretation is superior to the Roe's original theory based on a generalized reproductive privacy right. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 3:19 pm
Alas, the law firm was unable to accommodate his “superior legal mind. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 12:35 pm
People v. [read post]
5 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
Schwartz’s analysis is trenchant, well-written, amply-documented, and easy to read. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 12:06 pm
In issuing an order under this subsection, the court shall take into consideration the well-being of the companion animal. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 12:58 pm
The Council could well have concluded there were far superior support networks in its area. 2. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 9:16 am
Superior Court (1981)). [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 11:29 pm
Fernandez v. [read post]
