Search for: "People v. To"
Results 841 - 860
of 72,958
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2009, 11:35 am
When you've got lots of cases involving searches that turn up guns, you may have a keener sense that virtually everyone has a gun (or that most people searched have a gun) than actually exists.I don't know how much this plays into things, but I'd be surprised if there wasn't some tendency along these lines. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 11:27 am
The victim met the defendant through a Craigslist advertisement for sex, and defendant said in his ads that he'd meet people at their hotel room and provide a "session" for them for $140 (which is how the police picked him up). [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 12:32 pm
Those people often as a matter of law similarly lack the mental state to incur criminal liability. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 10:59 am
Even though there's a huge part of us that doesn't want to allow people who knew they were transporting drugs to quibble at trial about whether they really "knew" that the drugs they were transporting were 10, 20, 50 or 50.425 kilos.So it's a tough issue. [read post]
21 May 2010, 11:50 am
People use those words just in case their cell phones are intercepted or they're subject to a tap. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 1:12 pm
Prior to opening statements, he told the court he was going to introduce various pages from the Bible, and that these were relevant because:"What I have to do here is I have to demonstrate that there's something else going on in this world that people are aware of. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:07 am
You have to be a little, well, "different" when you threaten to kill people in an open and obvious way. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 9:27 am
(Patco Construction Company v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 3:10 pm
Heather’s Legal Summaries: R v Trinchi, 2019 ONCA 356 R v Trinchi is the most recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision in a string of cases related to the offence of voyeurism under s. 162(1) of the Criminal Code (see our previous post on the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R v Jarvis). [read post]
16 May 2017, 9:07 am
State v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 10:17 am
Any contract is purely up to the parties to negotiate, with the People representing society, the defendant representing the individual interests, and the judge deciding only fairness. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:34 am
A legislator might think that guards are generally good people; that they operate under stress; that they generally do things for good (rather than bad) reasons; and that even when they make mistakes, they should generally be forgiven, or at least have the option of being forgiven. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:27 pm
" Oops.Okay, now, normal people, in a traditional setting, might say: "Oh, sorry. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 10:38 am
Because the science here -- at least for people like this -- just ain't that good. [read post]
15 May 2008, 8:12 am
In Warner v. [read post]
21 Jan 2007, 9:16 pm
Roe v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 7:16 am
In the most recent case, Dobbs v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 3:56 pm
In honor of the anniversary of Brown v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 9:17 am
The ruling in the case of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 9:54 am
In Ezell v. [read post]
