Search for: "People v. Wells" Results 841 - 860 of 27,493
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2012, 11:54 am
  But definitely for the amount that you voluntarily put up.The Court of Appeal says, well, the $100,000 bond was "void". [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 9:40 am by Ted Frank
The remedy is coupons (well, "vouchers") for free popcorn that the plaintiffs' attorneys will no doubt seek to value at full price, though the vouchers are unlikely to be fully used. [read post]
14 May 2017, 1:56 pm by NCC Staff
On May 14, 1973, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Frontiero v. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 3:13 pm
The comments are detailed and very helpful, adding a lot to my scanty commentary, so, for the housing lawyers amongst us, it is well worth reading their comments on my posts on Shala v Birmingham Aweys v Birmingham Omar v Birmingham and now Doherty v Birmingham (House of Lords bound, apparently) And to the CLP people, lovely to see you here, what took you so long? [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 11:28 am by Donald Thompson
Such misconduct may impair a defendant's due process rights and require a reversal of the conviction (see, e.g., People v Robertson, 12 NY2d 355; People v Savvides, 1 NY2d 554; People v Creasy, 236 NY 205; Napue v Illinois, 360 US 264; Alcorta v Texas, 355 US 28). [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:33 pm by David Gans
The Court is expected to release its long awaited opinions in Brown v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 7:52 am by Eric Goldman
To be clear, I’d say that about any government official who advanced their job using their social media account yet blocked people from that account. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 5:29 am by Chris Seaton
No less an authority than the United States Supreme Court declared this a non-issue this year when they denied certiorari in Davis v. [read post]