Search for: "Plante v. State" Results 841 - 860 of 4,526
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2020, 9:30 am by Sophie Corke
States Have Sovereign Immunity from Copyright Damages | [Guest post] ‘Upload filters’ and human rights: implementing Article 17 of the Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market | Stairway to Heaven: The impact of Zeppelin on Katy Perry's copyright infringement case - overturned | China says ‘No’ to the malicious filing of Coronavirus-related trade marks | Does the requirement for a "technical contribution" in a novel… [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
Georgia - Allowing federal lawsuits against states turns out to be unpopular… among states. 11th Amendment incoming. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 4:31 am by Shannon O'Hare
According to US Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo, the sanctions were issued “for the sale and transport of Venezuela’s crude oil” which violated the existing US sanctions on PDVSA. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 1:16 pm by FHH Law
Section 43.21(c) Letter – Common carriers with operating revenue over the indexed revenue threshold must file a letter with the Chief of the Wireline Competition Bureau showing the carriers operating revenues for the prior year and the value of its total communications plant at the end of the year. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
Its title is the Humane Society of the United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 8:04 am by Barry Sookman
Governments have sometimes moved early to regulate specific high risk technologies, nuclear power plants, pharmaceuticals, and medical devices, being a few examples. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 8:04 am by Barry Sookman
Governments have sometimes moved early to regulate specific high risk technologies, nuclear power plants, pharmaceuticals, and medical devices, being a few examples. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 6:46 am by Hayleigh Bosher
 This will have a direct impact of the decision on Ed Sheeran "Let's Get it On" v "Thinking Out Loud" case [Katpost here], where Sheeran's lawyers argued that the Let's Get It On deposit defines the scope of protection, but Townsend's team argued that the composition is embodied on the Gaye recording. [read post]