Search for: "Pounds v. United States"
Results 841 - 860
of 1,469
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2014, 4:49 am
Under the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment, the government generally “has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content” (United States v Stevens, 559 US 460, 468 [2010] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 7:30 am
The penalty for doing so can be a 150-euro fine (£120; $205). [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:10 pm
How Texas Courts will Approach the MCA Exemption after Allen v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 5:23 pm
Other news In the case of Appleyard v Wilby, the claimant was awarded £60,000 libel damages by Bean J after default judgment had been entered in respect of defamatory blogs and tweets. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 8:45 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:36 am
Wong, 13-1074, and United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 8:42 am
<> Report Reveals Companies That Dumped 206 Pounds of Toxic Chemicals Into Our Waterways - Environment America's report also reveals the top 10 states for toxic dumping. . . [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 12:51 pm
State v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 9:07 am
United States, involving another do-gooder, this time in Burlington, Vermont, trying to convert an old railbed to a recreational trail. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 10:56 pm
Michael v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 9:20 am
” Last fall the Court invited the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States. [read post]
28 May 2014, 8:48 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Oklahoma v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:37 am
It was Arzú who had just persuaded the United Nations to take Guatemala off its blacklist. [read post]
22 May 2014, 5:00 am
Generally, government employees are immune from discovery in private litigation under rules first set out in United States ex rel. [read post]
19 May 2014, 8:43 pm
Procedural HistoryThis appeal arises out of an interference proceeding before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) relating to drug treatments for spinal nerve injuries. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:49 pm
The judge in Gardener v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 12:34 pm
While a majority of the lingcod was released, 11,000 pounds were retained and sold commercially, running the corporation afoul with state law. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 3:16 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 6:05 pm
Back in January, we warned about what happened today: the United States Supreme Court has okayed police pulling people over to search their vehicles based upon an anonymous tip in the case of Navarette v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 1:55 pm
There is no authority in the Constitution of the United States or in this Court’s precedents for the Judiciary to set aside Michigan laws that commit this policy determination to the voters. [read post]
