Search for: "Price v. The State of Texas"
Results 841 - 860
of 1,374
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2008, 3:07 pm
The only authorities he had for this statement were: (1) a pro se case in which the issue was never briefed (DePietro), (2) a very weakly defended case in which the issue was never briefed (the Texas case "Atlantic v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am
John's University School of LawKatherine Schostok, DePaul University College of LawAllison Winnike, University of Houston Law Center 5:00 – 7:00 PM Welcome Reception – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law Friday, June 9, 20177:30 – 8:15 AM Registration & Breakfast – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law 8:15 – 8:30 AM Opening Remarks – Ceremonial Courtroom, Georgia State LawWendy Hensel, Interim Dean and Professor of Law, Georgia… [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 8:13 am
I have also filed an amicus brief in Martin v. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 9:55 am
MSP Corp. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 9:56 am
Comm’n v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 4:15 pm
Texas was not the first state to pass photographic voter ID legislation. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 7:20 pm
In 2013, the Court struck down the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 2:55 pm
” The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals recently issued a decision, Orthofix, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 12:07 pm
Texas. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 5:09 am
(Docket Report) (271 Patent Blog) District Court E D Texas: Defendant may not present jury argument concerning KSR’s change to obviousness standard: Datatreasurycorp v Wells Fargo & Co et al (Docket Report) District Court E Texas: Entire operating system cannot serve as royalty base where only the workspace switching feature is accused of infringement: IP Innovation, LLC. et al v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 5:09 am
(Docket Report) (271 Patent Blog) District Court E D Texas: Defendant may not present jury argument concerning KSR’s change to obviousness standard: Datatreasurycorp v Wells Fargo & Co et al (Docket Report) District Court E Texas: Entire operating system cannot serve as royalty base where only the workspace switching feature is accused of infringement: IP Innovation, LLC. et al v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 6:00 am
-Texas) and Mike Turner (R. [read post]
16 May 2014, 6:22 pm
States of the United States do not have customs regulations and most states do not have to deal with international security issues in the course of interstate commerce. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 6:34 am
DC and the New Need to Eliminate Federal Patent Law Preemption of State and Local Price and Product Regulation, 2007 Patently-O Patent L.J. 30 (Download Sarnoff.BIO.pdf) John F. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 5:16 am
(For more on this, see Chambers v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:01 am
Evil-like price of $100 billion, then is the theoretical choice still a “realistic” one?) [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 6:48 pm
Alaska Statutes § 09.17.010; State v. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
Under Addington v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 11:19 am
DC and the New Need to Eliminate Federal Patent Law Preemption of State and Local Price and Product Regulation, 2007 Patently-O Patent L.J. 30 (Download Sarnoff.BIO.pdf) John F. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm
Gillies, Comment, Not with a bang, but a whimper: Congress’s proposal to overturn the Supreme Court’s Leegin decision with the Discount Pricing Consumer Protection Act of 2009, 18 VILLANOVA SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT LAW JOURNAL 645 (2011)Nathaniel Grow, Louisville v. [read post]
