Search for: "Price v. United States"
Results 841 - 860
of 5,286
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2014, 10:31 am
Galaria v. [read post]
1 Apr 2023, 2:01 pm
If you are bothering to read this blog, you likely know that most goods entering the United States are appraised on the basis of transaction value, whch is the total price paid or payable for the merchandise when sold for export to the United States. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 12:21 pm
Booky’ and noticed that Price and Windell were listed in `L.a. [read post]
18 May 2016, 9:59 am
On May 16, 2016, the United States Supreme Court handed down two decisions that may, in practice, limit the ability to access federal district courts. [read post]
14 Feb 2025, 6:30 am
That characterization has been generally accurate in United States, but is not inevitable. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 5:00 am
As the Supreme Court said in United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 2:12 pm
Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2008, 2:09 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 2:22 pm
The first was that sanctuaries beat the administration at the Supreme Court in June of that year; technically, the justices declined to hear United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:32 pm
LinkLine Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:39 am
United States, No. 1:10-cv8435 (S.D.N.Y.); see also Pedersen v. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 7:22 am
United States is one of those increasingly rare cases in which the Court of International Trade had to determine the value of imported merchandise. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 8:46 am
Afterwards, he joined the United States Attorney's Office in Chicago, where he served as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Criminal Division. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 5:39 pm
The key question was whether the "lawfully made under this title" language of the first sale section refers to items that were physically made in the United States or whether it encompasses copies that were licensed by a United States copyright holder but manufactured abroad. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 12:03 pm
Today I was in Mannheim for an IPCom v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 9:59 am
Facts: This case (Jones et al v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 11:37 am
Facts: This case (Loggerhead Tools, LLC v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 5:28 am
Accordingly, our review of the trial court's application of the law to the facts is de novo.See United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 8:13 am
United States v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 8:03 am
Board of Trade, 06-1265), on the power of states to tax the interest on other states' municipal bonds (Kentucky Department of Revenue v. [read post]
