Search for: "STEVENS v. PAGE"
Results 841 - 860
of 1,404
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2010, 7:53 am
SCOTUSblog’s Tom Goldstein examines the Term’s pattern of opinion assignments and finds it “quite likely . . . that Justice Stevens was originally going to author the Court’s opinion in Bilski [v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 7:39 am
Humanitarian Law Project and Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 12:14 pm
But what about the remaining 57 pages? [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 3:26 pm
” Throughout his entire career, Stevens has cited Brady v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:24 pm
"The institution is not going in the direction he thinks it should," he said.That was clear this year when he was on the losing side in Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 7:55 pm
Stevens’ opinion runs on for 47 pages (of the total 71 pages in the combined Bilski opinions). [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 8:33 pm
"Farewell, Stevens: the Supreme Court loses its cryptographer" http://j.mp/aOsGAU i guess this is a good move from techcrunch ... [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 7:42 pm
As for Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:37 pm
” Like the Viacom v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 4:54 am
My travel yesterday took a page from "Planes, Trains & Automobiles" - so it was humorous to first see a CNBC text that the stock market was up because the US Supreme Court had stricken the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, only to find out that the 5-4 decision in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:38 pm
Today, in the landmark decision of McDonald v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
First, on page 2 footnote 2 of Justice Stevens' dissent (p. 124 of the .pdf), he cites the George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal! [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:09 pm
Justice Scalia spends the next 14+ pages responding to Justice Stevens' dissent. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:46 am
The Court previously considered and rejected a similar claim in Green v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:33 am
Some of the most significant language appears at pdf pages 20-33 (hard copy pages 14-27). [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:11 am
I am still digesting the 71 pages (which includes the main opinion authored by Justice Kennedy, as well Justice Stevens' opinion (joined by Justices Ginsburg, Breyer and Sotomayor) concurring in the judgment, and Justice Breyer's opinion (joined in part by Justice Scalia) concurring in the judgment).In the interim, my colleague Michael J. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:31 am
" Based on today’s ruling and the concurring opinion of Justice Stevens, it will be interesting to see whether the Supreme Court will further define patent eligible subject matter and grant certiorari (PDF) in Mayo v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:37 am
The Second Amendment case is out: Erin: Alito announces McDonald v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:25 am
The decision in McDonald v. [read post]
