Search for: "Say v. Baker"
Results 841 - 860
of 1,405
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2013, 9:22 am
Meanwhile, at 'In These Times," Richard Baker explains why jurors are simultaneously stupid and pseudo-intellectual, and how this explains jurors frustrating justice by returning not guilty verdicts in cases like People v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 7:23 am
She cited Crawford v. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 5:19 am
In United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 8:06 am
In the 19th-century Baker v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
That happened to us recently, hence this post.When an application is required to sell an FDA-regulated product (including almost all such products likely to be involved in litigation), the manufacturer cannot sell it in the U.S. until and unless the FDA says ‘yes. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 10:14 am
Says the IPKat, since there's no immediate deadline for the submission of opinions (which won't of course influence the CJEU but might colour the UK government's decision to make representations to that court), it would be good if interested readers focused on the legal issues rather than just making sweeping and rhetorical assertions. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 11:27 pm
-William Brennan: He receives an extra push from me because I'm a voting rights guy, and he pretty much started the field with Baker v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 1:08 pm
The argument that it does will run into Employment Division v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:56 am
Be sure to read Stewart Baker’s post at Volokh Conspiracy in response to DNI Clapper’s statement, as well as Orin Kerr’s post at the same blog focusing on the legal standard Clapper invoked in his statement—the Terry v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 12:15 am
The doctrine of inherent anticipation (particularly after Schering Co. v Geneva Pharmaceuticals Inc. et Al., commented here - see also, in the UK, Merrell Dow v H N Norton & Co), may lead to similar distortions. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 11:55 am
Feist Publ'ns, Inc. v. [read post]
27 May 2013, 7:36 am
Baker, suggesting that a certain set of studies is not worthy of consideration because it was “litigant-funded. [read post]
25 May 2013, 2:14 am
If they say yes, then the defense has been able to indirectly impeach Trayvon Martin. [read post]
25 May 2013, 2:14 am
If they say yes, then the defense has been able to indirectly impeach Trayvon Martin. [read post]
4 May 2013, 7:40 am
US v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 3:57 am
Marshall (citing the same Justice Black opinion from Reid v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:21 pm
Maybe the Supreme Court should start kicking cases on the ground of a "textual committment to a co-equal branch" of government as the political question doctrine stated in Baker v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:21 pm
Maybe the Supreme Court should start kicking cases on the ground of a "textual committment to a co-equal branch" of government as the political question doctrine stated in Baker v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 10:05 am
Malletier, Louis V, plaintiff. [read post]
