Search for: "Sellers v. Sellers" Results 841 - 860 of 6,110
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2021, 11:47 am by Kevin LaCroix
The level of short seller scrutiny of post-SPAC companies even further increases the likelihood. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, according the plaintiff the benefit of every favorable inference, she sufficiently alleged the existence of an attorney-client relationship (see Hall v Hobbick, 192 AD3d 776; see also Tropp v Lumer, 23 AD3d at 551). [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 9:12 am by Eric Goldman
Sunfrog * Online Marketplace Defeats Trademark Suit Because It’s Not the “Seller”–OSU v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 10:31 am by Eric Goldman
Because that deal removes bidders from the auction process for specific items, the court shouldn’t need much additional evidence to show how the seller was harmed in the process. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 4:32 am by Peter Mahler
” 2014: By this time the Clarks had taken on all of OP’s financing except for one seller-financed loan of approximately $1 million (the “Shultz Loan”). [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 7:04 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In this regard, it bears noting that plaintiff signed the January 2018 sales contract for 0 Rhode Island Avenue as “seller. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 6:17 am by Gibbons P.C.
“Those of us who work with David at Gibbons are delighted he is being recognized for his career-long achievements in the areas of environmental law and brownfield redevelopment in New York City,” said Camille V. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 6:17 am by Gibbons P.C.
“Those of us who work with David at Gibbons are delighted he is being recognized for his career-long achievements in the areas of environmental law and brownfield redevelopment in New York City,” said Camille V. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 6:17 am by Gibbons P.C.
“Those of us who work with David at Gibbons are delighted he is being recognized for his career-long achievements in the areas of environmental law and brownfield redevelopment in New York City,” said Camille V. [read post]
31 May 2021, 7:51 pm by Peter Mahler
The New York Court of Appeals’ 2012 opinion in Pappas v Tzolis, decided in the wake and spirit of that court’s rulings the year before in the Centro Empresarial v America Movil and Arfa v Zamir cases, raised the bar for claims of fraud and breach of fiduciary duty brought by non-controlling shareholders and LLC members in connection with buyout transactions. [read post]