Search for: "Smith v. Paul"
Results 841 - 860
of 1,060
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am
Because the government now agrees with petitioner Paul Erlinger that judges cannot constitutionally make that finding, the court appointed Nick Harper, former clerk to Justice Amy Coney Barrett, to argue in support of the judgment below. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 10:18 am
Smith, which held that religious liberty loses to mandates imposed by generally applicable laws. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 9:28 am
Thanks to Beth Burch, Marcia McCormick, Paul McGreal, Dayna Royal, Brooks Smith, Dan Solove, and Norman Williams for comments on earlier drafts. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
Randy Smith accusing the panel's majority of writing new law saying "We have never held that an actress' performance could be copyrightable". [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:25 pm
Smith that "an individual's religious beliefs" do not "excuse him from compliance with an otherwise valid law. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm
Dogs were first used by the police in the early 1900s, and by the 1950s the modern era of police dog use was underway in the United States (Dorriety, Police Service Dogs in the Use-of-Force Continuum (2005) 16 Criminal Justice Policy Review 88). [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm
Dogs were first used by the police in the early 1900s, and by the 1950s the modern era of police dog use was underway in the United States (Dorriety, Police Service Dogs in the Use-of-Force Continuum (2005) 16 Criminal Justice Policy Review 88). [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 6:21 am
Roy and Lyng v. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 11:05 pm
A similar story was recently told before Mrs Justice Slade in the Queens Bench Division in Arthur J Gallagher Services and others v Skriptchenko and Others [2016] EWHC 603. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
On November 14, 2014, in Priests for Life v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 11:09 am
Antonin Scalia had an acid tongue ("pure applesauce," "jiggery-pokery"), and he did his share of trolling as well (once responding to a law student's question about Bush v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 9:00 am
Finally: Mondaq has a very nice summary of the Fifth Circuit's recent opinion in Avalon Legal Information Svcs. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Smith, Brandon G. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 8:23 am
J. 20 *** Susan Power Johnston, CRAM-DOWN INTEREST RATES: DEVELOPMENTS FOLLOWING TILL V. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Smith, Brandon G. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
Paul, Minnesota and practiced law in Vermont. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 4:55 am
The Court of Appeal (Lord Justices Pill and Patten, plus Sir Paul Kennedy) agreed. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 9:22 am
Special thanks to Paul Bond of Reed Smith LLP who first brought this to my attention. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:28 am
That was in Coyle v. [read post]
