Search for: "Springs v. United States" Results 841 - 860 of 1,984
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2011, 8:05 am by JB
Both are fully available to the United States, and, moreover, the United States is currently employing them. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:30 am by Dan Ernst
The following spring, Roberts joined the majority in upholding Washington State's minimum wage statute. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:46 am by Lawrence Solum
The following spring, Roberts joined the majority in upholding Washington State’s minimum wage statute. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 3:37 am by Adam Lupion, Joshua Fox and David Gobel
  The players voted to unionize, becoming the first unionized college sports team in the United States. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 9:51 pm by Josh Blackman, guest-blogging
I have a number of other articles in the works on topics including legislative responses to mass shootings for a symposium issue of the Connecticut Law Review, 3D Printing and the Second Amendment for a symposium issue of the Tennessee Law Review (a key application of how data and speech are connected), Kennedy’s Constitutional Chimera (blogged about earlier), the story behind United States v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 6:09 am by Marissa Miller
” At Buzzfeed, Chris Geidner explains how the Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Nixon and Kissinger negotiated the Paris Peace Accords and ended the Vietnam War for the United States in January 1973. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 7:25 am
§ 11.01(16) is unconstitutionally overbroad and vague under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article 1, Section 3 of the Wisconsin Constitution because its language "'is so sweeping that its sanctions may be applied to constitutionally protected conduct which the state is not permitted to regulate.'"  State v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:16 am by Dennis Crouch
Silver Spring Networks, Inc., No. 16-551 (Appeal of question of law without Fed. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 9:28 am by Sheldon Toplitt
The complaint includes two counts alleging violation of the First Amendment and Fourth Amendment rights of the plaintiffs pursuant to 42 U.S.C. sec. 1983 (Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights), which in relevant part provides: "Every person, who under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom or usage of any State...subjects...any citizen of the United States...to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and… [read post]
9 Dec 2007, 11:33 pm
Supreme Court expanded the transnational character of its OT '07 docket.The 1st of 2 transnational cases the Court's agreed to hear next spring is Philippines v. [read post]