Search for: "Stanford Law Review"
Results 841 - 860
of 3,687
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2011, 11:11 am
When Stanford sought review, the Court called for the views of the Solicitor General; the Court granted review after the Solicitor General recommended that certiorari be granted. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 11:22 pm
Kudos to our colleague, Stanford Law's Allen S. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 7:16 am
Sarah Krakoff has published “They Were Here First: American Indian Tribes, Race, and the Constitutional Minimum” in the Stanford Law Review. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 6:50 am
Bobby Chesney (Wake Forest) and Jack Goldsmith (Harvard) have posted Terrorism and the Convergence of Criminal and Military Detention Models (Stanford Law Review, Vol. 60, 2008) on SSRN. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 9:30 am
Here's another recent JOTWELL review of interest: Writing for the Property section, Ezra Rosser (American University Washington College of Law) reviews "The Rise of Federal Title," by Gregory Ablavsky (Stanford Law School). [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 12:25 pm
Arnold (Tulane Law School) has posted How Immigration Detention Became Exceptional (Stanford Law Review, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 12:59 pm
Why haven't we spoken about Peter Conti-Brown's "Scarcity Amidst Wealth: The Law, Finance, and Culture of Elite University Endowments in Financial Crisis," which appeared in the March 2011 issue of the Stanford Law Review? [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 12:10 pm
Gregory Ablavsky (Stanford Law School) has posted Akhil Amar's Unusable Past (Michigan Law Review, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 12:58 am
Olin Center for Law, Economics, and Business) has posted Legislative Threats (Stanford Law Review, Vol. 61, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 6:06 pm
In the following guest post, Michael Klausner, Professor of Law, Stanford Law School, and Jason Hegland, Executive Director, Stanford Securities Litigation Analytics, using the Stanford Securities Litigation Analytics database, identify and review several of these developments. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 10:29 am
Stanford Law Review, Forthcoming. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 6:49 pm
Why not Yale, Stanford, Chicago, NYU, and Columbia, next? [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
, (Fordham International Law Journal, Vol. 42, No. 3, 2019).Matteo Winkler, Same-Sex Marriage and Italian Exceptionalism, (ICL Journal 2018; 12(4); 431–456).Hannah Haksgaard, Blending Surnames at Marriage, (30 Stanford Law & Policy Review __ (2019) (Forthcoming)).Shazny Ramlan, Religious Law for the Environment: Comparative Islamic Environmental Law in Singapore, Malaysia, and Indonesia, (NUS Centre for Asian Legal Studies Working Paper… [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 3:00 am
Ablavsky (Stanford Law School) has now posted "Further Thoughts on the Constitutional History of Federal Power Over Indian Affairs. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 9:30 pm
In an article in the Stanford Law Review, Alexandra Klass, a professor at the University of Minnesota Law School, and several coauthors considered how clean energy can support a more stable, low-carbon electric grid. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 1:08 am
Tino Cuéllar, back at Stanford after a gig in the White House, recently published a fascinating piece in the Chicago Law Review on national security agency reorganizations - there is DHS, of course, but there's also a New Deal security agency with a history he uncovered. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 12:37 am
Scott (Stanford Law School , Columbia University - Law School and Columbia University - Law School) have posted Contract and Innovation: The Limited Role of Generalist Courts in the Evolution of Novel Contractual Terms (New York University Law Review, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 12:39 pm
This lead journals like the Stanford Law Review to reject all electronic submissions, other than via its own portal. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 10:18 am
The article is forthcoming in the Stanford Law Review. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 1:44 pm
Here is what I wrote in my draft paper on lobbying reform (out next year in the Stanford Law Review) about Palin’s views. [read post]
