Search for: "State California v. Superior Court"
Results 841 - 860
of 4,023
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2011, 3:30 am
Superior Court, 114 Cal. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 9:31 pm
Court" and then published this analysis: REST BREAK AND MEAL PERIOD CLAIMS AFTER MURPHY V. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 3:42 pm
(Gade v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 12:30 pm
Navarro v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 5:18 pm
Last month, Judge Freedman in Alameda County Superior Court ruled that the State was required to list all the chemicals identified by reference in Labor Code sections 6382(b)(1) and 6382(d). [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:05 am
Our bad.The second, issued minutes later, in State Farm v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 8:01 am
Whitaker v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 6:04 am
Superior Court [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:28 pm
(B245131; 224 Cal.App.4th 1105; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BS131347.) [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 11:35 am
A California wage theft lawsuit filed on behalf of 240 workers is being settled for $690,000, having been given the preliminary approval from a superior court judge recently. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 4:29 am
The Superior Court of Santa Clara County, Cal., No. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 8:00 am
A plaintiff sues your company in California Superior Court. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 2:02 pm
The gift that keeps on giving, the California Supreme Court decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 6:46 am
Superior Court, 18 Cal.4th 1, 8-17 74 Cal.Rptr.2d 248, 954 P.2d 511 (1998) (California, the state in which the intentional spoliation-of-evidence action found its beginnings, reversed positions and no longer recognizes that tort, relying instead on traditional remedies. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 11:16 am
Superior Court (Romero) (1996) 13 Cal.4th 497, 530-531 (Romero).) [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 5:00 am
Plaintiff initially filed suit in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Diego. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 1:56 pm
Superior Court (2012) 53 Cal.4th 1004, 1026; Reynolds v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 6:54 pm
Superior Court of California, San Francisco Cty., 137 S. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 11:53 am
That was the case in the coverage action between football helmet manufacturer Riddell and its liability insurers, which is pending in California state court, where certain London Market Insurers tried to require the production of extensive discovery before that substantially identical production took place in the underlying product liability action. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 4:23 pm
In Perdue v. [read post]
