Search for: "State California v. Superior Court"
Results 841 - 860
of 3,615
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2022, 9:03 am
When I reported last Friday that Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Terry Green had ruled in favor of the plaintiffs in their challenge to California's board quota law, AB 979, all I had was a brief minute order from the court. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 6:18 am
On February 4, 2013 the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of Auer v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 4:08 am
Superior Court [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 11:54 am
The Court applied the test enunciated in Rales v. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 12:45 pm
Superior Court of Orange County, No. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 12:45 pm
Superior Court of Orange County, No. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 6:28 am
The latest installment arrived on Tuesday, as H.P. filed a lawsuit in the Superior Court of California in Santa Clara against Mr. [read post]
20 May 2010, 7:30 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit’s decision in Joblove v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 5:01 am
Superior Court (1970) 3 Cal. 3d. 398, 403.3Kirkwood v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 6:00 am
Superior Court (Cal. [read post]
27 May 2014, 5:04 pm
The Fourth District Court of Appeal’s decision earlier this month in Hall v. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 10:57 am
Superior Court of Los Angeles County and Jose Calderon, Case No. [read post]
12 Feb 2022, 5:42 am
Superior Court (2000) 78 Cal.App.4th 562, 567-568.) [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 12:15 am
Superior Court, 95 Cal. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 4:04 pm
Superior Court, the California Supreme Court case on which they are based. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 10:58 pm
Starbucks, in which a California Superior Court judge rejected the evidence presented by coffee roasters and retailers to demonstrate that exposures to acrylamide in coffee were exempt from Proposition 65’s warning requirement. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 10:58 pm
Starbucks, in which a California Superior Court judge rejected the evidence presented by coffee roasters and retailers to demonstrate that exposures to acrylamide in coffee were exempt from Proposition 65’s warning requirement. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 1:43 pm
Superior Court and creates an intrastate conflict for California employers. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 1:26 pm
Superior Court of Los Angeles County. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 10:51 am
" He sued in King County Superior Court under the Jones Act and the doctrine of unseaworthiness. [read post]