Search for: "State California v. Superior Court" Results 841 - 860 of 3,643
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2018, 8:44 am by Nassiri Law
Superior Court, the state supreme court in April issued a series of criteria by which carriers could figure out whether a truck driver is an employee or an independent contractor (owner-operator). [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 4:11 pm by Jon Sands
The superior court had dismissed his state habeas petition as "untimely and unmeritorious;" the California Court of Appeal denied his state habeas petition without comment; and the California Supreme Court denied it with "see" citations to In re Swain, 209 P.2d 793 (Cal. 1949), and People v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 2:14 pm
(We all assume, as we must given the procedural posture of the case, that he's right; that state law didn't limit the plaintiff to only 12 plants.)Defendants then seek summary judgment on a stupid ground, which both the trial court and the Court of Appeal properly reject. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 1:40 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Superior Court (2013) 217 Cal.App.4th 889, the California Infill Builders Federation (Infill Builders) submitted an August 16, 2013 letter to the high court requesting that the opinion be depublished pursuant to Rule 8.1125 of the California Rules of Court. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 9:03 am
When I reported last Friday that Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Terry Green had ruled in favor of the plaintiffs in their challenge to California's board quota law, AB 979, all I had was a brief minute order from the court. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 6:28 am by David Krenkel
The latest installment arrived on Tuesday, as H.P. filed a lawsuit in the Superior Court of California in Santa Clara against Mr. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 11:44 am by Robert Odell
Freeze has stated on their blog: “Ironically, Bingham McCutchen knew their arbitration agreement, as originally drafted, was invalid in light of a 2009 Massachusetts Supreme Court opinion: Warfield v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 8:30 am by Steven G. Pearl
Superior Court (2007) 42 Cal.4th 443 (Gentry), Nelsen contends requiring individual arbitration of her wage and hour claims would violate California public policy even if the arbitration agreement is otherwise found to be valid and enforceable. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 9:31 pm
Well, now we know.)This opinion harkens back to the days of Chief Justice Traynor -- viewed by many as one of the greatest legal talents never to sit on the United States Supreme Court -- and is similarly scholarly, progressive, empirical, and informed. [read post]