Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 841 - 860 of 13,742
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2007, 8:58 am
Message by BSALegal.org on 9/15/2006 EST Boy Scouts filed a friend of the court brief with the Supreme Court of the United States this week supporting the reversal of the California Supreme Court's decision in Evans v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 8:25 am by Kara M. Maciel
  For the second time in a year, a United States District Court has held that claims based on California’s meal and rest period laws are preempted by federal law. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 6:56 pm
The State of California does not allow a debtor to use Federal bankruptcy exemptions under Title 11 of the United States Code ("Title 11 U.S.C.). [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:45 pm
Even former United States Attorney General Eric Holder recently expressed his belief that marijuana “ought to be rescheduled. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 6:02 am by Mathew Klein
On December 3, 2010, the acting United States Solicitor General filed the long-awaited amicus curiae brief of the United States in the case of Maxwell-Jolly v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 1:01 pm by Mali Friedman
Additionally, as a practical matter, some service providers already require a search warrant before disclosing stored content to law enforcement based on the Sixth Circuit’s 2010 decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 1:41 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Seyfarth Synopsis: The Fifth Appellate District provided its prediction for the California Supreme Court’s decision in Adolph v. [read post]
The United States Supreme Court and multiple California courts have held that a CBA may require arbitration of an employee’s statutory claims only if the CBA includes a “clear and unmistakable” waiver of the right to bring those statutory claims in a judicial forum. [read post]
The United States Supreme Court and multiple California courts have held that a CBA may require arbitration of an employee’s statutory claims only if the CBA includes a “clear and unmistakable” waiver of the right to bring those statutory claims in a judicial forum. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:03 am
"As the United States moves toward consensus on matters of marriage, it is also coming together on the dangers of overcriminalization," writes Neal Katyal.In Elonis v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 10:26 am by Patent Arcade Staff
Sega of America Inc et al United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaCase No. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 9:21 am
Lohr, 518 U.S. 470, the United States Supreme Court considered whether the abbreviated 510(k) approval process preempts state law causes of action. [read post]