Search for: "State of New York v. Green" Results 841 - 860 of 1,426
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2012, 7:00 am by William A. Ruskin
LAWRENCE is a Senior Counsel at Epstein Becker & Green in New York. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
 And he had a new work, a three-volume set with a long title: Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States; With a Preliminary Review of the Constitutional History of the Colonies and States, Before the Adoption of the Constitution. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 7:19 pm by admin
In fact, a New York Times study back in 2009 found that the groundwater surrounding Ms. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 9:15 am by Rick Hills
NYC law treats these violations as Class A misdemeanors, and New York State treats the most harshly punished fraud (identity theft) as a Class D Felony subject to a five-year maximum sentence. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 12:03 pm by William A. Ruskin
Allison  is an Associate in Epstein Becker & Green's Asbestos Group in New York. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 7:32 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
United States, 260 U.S. 178, 190 (1922) (finding that Japanese immigrant was not eligible for naturalization); United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 3:30 am
Cardarelli, 527 F.3d 25, 26 (2d Cir. 2008), where it construed CAFA exceptions for securities-linked suits but declined to apply them where an action brought under New York's consumer fraud statute involving marketing debt securities. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 5:54 am by Rob Robinson
 bit.ly/zwruTK (Ron Friedmann) Cost of Converting (Electronically Stored Information) Jardin v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:18 am by admin
By Drew Carroll It’s a cold winter evening in New York City. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 7:51 am by My name
New York State Urban Development Corp., 892 N.Y.S.2d 8, 28 (N.Y. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 4:00 am by Wystan M. Ackerman
On January 30, I published a blog post about a Southern District of New York decision holding that an arbitration clause barring class actions was unenforceable because the costs of an individual arbitration effectively would preclude the plaintiff from pursuing her statutory rights under the Fair Labor Standards Act. [read post]