Search for: "State v. Alexander" Results 841 - 860 of 2,134
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2007, 10:12 am
"That basic proportionality argument did not persuade the state Supreme Court, when it was one of a number of arguments made on appeal in State v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 10:23 am by Emily Root
  David Alexander and Emily Root of Squire Sanders represented distributors in each of these cases. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 7:09 am
Later, a version of interposition termed “Judicial Federalism” emerged as a constraint on federal legislative power in Printz v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 7:08 am by Christine Corcos
Later, a version of interposition termed “Judicial Federalism” emerged as a constraint on federal legislative power in Printz v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Citing Alexander Hamilton in Federalist No. 82, Ginsburg and Thomas opined that the federal and state governments together comprise a single system of justice for double jeopardy purposes. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am by Kyle Persaud
Alexander, 527 F.Supp. 796, 802, judgment affirmed in part, vacated in part 706 F.2d 751 (6th Cir.1983), on remand 573 F.Supp. 373 (1983), affirmed 751 F.2d 384 (6th Cir.1984). [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am by Kyle Persaud
Alexander, 527 F.Supp. 796, 802, judgment affirmed in part, vacated in part 706 F.2d 751 (6th Cir.1983), on remand 573 F.Supp. 373 (1983), affirmed 751 F.2d 384 (6th Cir.1984). [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 11:14 am by Ajay Sarma, Christiana Wayne
Sourabh Gupta examined the impact of South China Sea arbitration before the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea tribunal five years after its landmark decision in Philippines v. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 4:44 pm
Alexander Rivard died on October 24, 2013. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 3:02 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The defendants claim that after the individual plaintiff, Alexander Komolov, and Segal informed the defendants of the transaction, Segal provided a handwritten statement, which stated a [*2]purchase price of $4,100,000 and certain costs. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Friday 23 October, the Supreme Court will hand down the judgment of R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 12:46 pm by Brett Natarelli
On October 3, the second morning of its new term, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) heard oral arguments in the case of Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 8:36 am by Aaron
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/823979.no1.pdf State v. [read post]