Search for: "State v. Alexander"
Results 841 - 860
of 2,107
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2022, 4:05 am
That change is visible within the apex organs of the contemporary state system ((Text of A/ES-11/L.1; UN General Assembly Resolution -- "Aggression against Ukraine"; UKRAINE v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Murphy v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
Alexander Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland 08a0299p.06 2008/08/18 Jerman v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 2:06 pm
In a 1991 case, Freytag v. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 2:06 am
” “Here, because Brooks plead guilty to certain tax evasion counts, those convictions were not abated by the Second Circuit in United States v Brooks (872 F3d 78, 87-88 [2d Cir 2017)). [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 10:23 am
David Alexander and Emily Root of Squire Sanders represented distributors in each of these cases. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 10:12 am
"That basic proportionality argument did not persuade the state Supreme Court, when it was one of a number of arguments made on appeal in State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 7:43 am
Hughes v. [read post]
18 May 2014, 10:30 am
Alexander, 685 F.3d 325, 347 (3d Cir. 2012). [read post]
18 May 2014, 10:30 am
Alexander, 685 F.3d 325, 347 (3d Cir. 2012). [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
Alexander, 527 F.Supp. 796, 802, judgment affirmed in part, vacated in part 706 F.2d 751 (6th Cir.1983), on remand 573 F.Supp. 373 (1983), affirmed 751 F.2d 384 (6th Cir.1984). [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
Alexander, 527 F.Supp. 796, 802, judgment affirmed in part, vacated in part 706 F.2d 751 (6th Cir.1983), on remand 573 F.Supp. 373 (1983), affirmed 751 F.2d 384 (6th Cir.1984). [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 2:40 am
The Supreme Court The case of Chisholm v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 2:40 am
The case of Chisholm v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
State v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 7:08 am
Later, a version of interposition termed “Judicial Federalism” emerged as a constraint on federal legislative power in Printz v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 7:09 am
Later, a version of interposition termed “Judicial Federalism” emerged as a constraint on federal legislative power in Printz v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 4:30 am
Certainly the momentousness of, say, Bush v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 1:00 am
On Friday 23 October, the Supreme Court will hand down the judgment of R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 9:01 pm
Citing Alexander Hamilton in Federalist No. 82, Ginsburg and Thomas opined that the federal and state governments together comprise a single system of justice for double jeopardy purposes. [read post]
