Search for: "State v. Allen" Results 841 - 860 of 2,727
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2013, 3:57 am by Lee Davis
United States, when it said that a jury should have the final say on what triggers mandatory minimum sentences in criminal cases.The Court voted in a 5-4 decision to overturn the sentencing decision in defendant Allen Alleyne’s case. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 10:00 am by Christine Corcos
The second group of essays traces the nature and dimensions of Blackstone's impact in various jurisdictions outside England, namely Quebec (Michel Morin), Louisiana and the United States more generally (John W Cairns and Stephen M Sheppard), North Carolina (John V Orth) and Australasia (Wilfrid Prest). [read post]
13 Dec 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Allen Boyer reviews Joshua C. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 11:42 am
The second group of essays traces the nature and dimensions of Blackstone's impact in various jurisdictions outside England, namely Quebec (Michel Morin), Louisiana and the United States more generally (John W Cairns and Stephen M Sheppard), North Carolina (John V Orth) and Australasia (Wilfrid Prest). [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 10:00 am
The second group of essays traces the nature and dimensions of Blackstone's impact in various jurisdictions outside England, namely Quebec (Michel Morin), Louisiana and the United States more generally (John W Cairns and Stephen M Sheppard), North Carolina (John V Orth) and Australasia (Wilfrid Prest). [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 9:30 pm by ernst
Congratulations to Samantha Barbas, University at Buffalo Law, on her receipt of an NEH grant for a "sociolegal history of New York Times Co. v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 7:50 am by Jay Willis
Florida, United States v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:59 am
Allen,  176 Wash.2d 611, 294 P.3d 679 (Washington Supreme Court 2013); accord State v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 7:57 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
But you can take this to the bank: the lockbox is legal.The case is Van Allen v. [read post]
24 Jun 2007, 8:58 am
From the Indiana Lawyer, an article on the recent Indiana Supreme Court decision:The state's eminent domain statute allows Indiana municipalities to acquire operations of privately owned water and sewer utilities that serve recently annexed portions of that community, the Indiana Supreme Court ruled today.The split 3-2 decision came in Utility Center, Inc., d/b/a Aquasource v. [read post]