Search for: "State v. Borough"
Results 841 - 860
of 1,317
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2011, 1:55 am
High Court (Administrative Court) BB, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2129 (Admin) (02 August 2011) S, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2120 (Admin) (05 August 2011) Bury Metropolitan Borough Council v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government & Anor [2011] EWHC 2192 (Admin) (12 August 2011) Source:… [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 3:48 pm
At first instance, which was before either Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2010] UKSC 45 or Hounslow London Borough Council v Powell [2011] UKSC 8 were handed down, the District Judge did not consider proportionality at all and a possession order was granted.There was then an appeal to HHJ Simpkiss.Mr H “is a young man of 21 years old. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 3:48 pm
At first instance, which was before either Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2010] UKSC 45 or Hounslow London Borough Council v Powell [2011] UKSC 8 were handed down, the District Judge did not consider proportionality at all and a possession order was granted.There was then an appeal to HHJ Simpkiss.Mr H “is a young man of 21 years old. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 3:19 pm
The term breached must be a term of the tenancy, not a 'personal obligation' (Paddington Churches Housing Association v Boateng 1999 Legal Action 27). [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 3:19 pm
The term breached must be a term of the tenancy, not a 'personal obligation' (Paddington Churches Housing Association v Boateng 1999 Legal Action 27). [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 12:06 pm
But the approach taken by the Court of Appeal in R v Wandsworth London Borough Council, Ex p O [2000] 1 WLR 2539 remained the law and had not been changed by the House of Lords in M v Slough. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 12:06 pm
But the approach taken by the Court of Appeal in R v Wandsworth London Borough Council, Ex p O [2000] 1 WLR 2539 remained the law and had not been changed by the House of Lords in M v Slough. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 5:19 am
’” United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 4:20 pm
Borough of Morrisville, 130 F.R.D. 612, 614 (E.D. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 12:47 am
The UK Supreme Court Blog posted commentaries on the cases of AB v Ministry of Defence and R (McDonald) v Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea [2011] UKSC 33. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm
Thomas & Ors v Bridgend County Borough Council [2011] EWCA Civ 862This Court of Appeal case might be rather limited on its facts, but there are some broader issues and it is interesting. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm
Thomas & Ors v Bridgend County Borough Council [2011] EWCA Civ 862This Court of Appeal case might be rather limited on its facts, but there are some broader issues and it is interesting. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 6:05 am
It’s a people’s republic, actually A better term might be micro-states – and, as we saw in dirty rotten boroughs, there’s certainly potential for micro-state corruption … if the micro-state is rich. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 7:08 am
The Supreme Court has refused permission for either Haringey Borough Council or the Secretary of State to appeal against the Court of Appeal’s decision in Shoesmith v OFSTED & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 642. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:23 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v CD [2011] EWHC 2087 (Admin) (29 July 2011): Control order ruled lawful: “reasonable grounds for suspecting CD is a leading figure in network of Islamist extremists” – see guardian.co.uk SCHALK AND KOPF v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:00 am
This case was wholly unlike the case of Pieretti v Enfield London Borough Council [2010] EWCA Civ 1104; [2011] PTSR 565 (which held that the section 49A duty complements a housing authority’s duties to the homeless under Part 7 of the Housing Act 1996). [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 2:38 am
Cout of Appeal (Civil Division) Meares v Medway Primary Care Trust [2011] EWCA Civ 897 (28 July 2011) Greyfort Properties Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 908 (28 July 2011) Lait v Evening Standard Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 859 (28 July 2011) O, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham [2011] EWCA Civ 925 (28 July 2011) St Helens & Knowsley Hospitals NHS Trust v Brownbill &… [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 8:36 am
Ingram v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 12:00 am
There is also an implied term in every employment contract that an employer will provide reasonable support to ensure that the employee can carry out his/her duties without harassment or disruption by fellow employees, following the case of Wigan Borough Council v Davies [1979] ICR 411. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:45 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) AR, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 857 (26 July 2011) Thomas & Ors v Bridgend County Borough Council [2011] EWCA Civ 862 (26 July 2011) Rust Consulting Ltd v PB Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 899 (26 July 2011) Destiny 1 Ltd v Lloyds TSB Bank Plc [2011] EWCA Civ 831 (26 July 2011) MH (Algeria), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the… [read post]
