Search for: "State v. Branch" Results 841 - 860 of 6,958
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment provides:No person [1] shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, [2] who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to… [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division sustained Supreme Court's granting this motion by DOE for Plaintiffs' failure "to state a cause of action. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division sustained Supreme Court's granting this motion by DOE for Plaintiffs' failure "to state a cause of action. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 11:50 am
Arar v Ashcroft is an example of this last category (although the court found that a Bivens action was not available because of state secrets considerations rather than directly under the state secrets doctrine). [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Matter of NYC C.L.A.S.H., Inc. v New York State Off. of Parks, Recreation & Historic Preserv., 27 NY3d 174, the court explained that "The concept of the separation of powers is the bedrock of the system of government adopted by this State in establishing three coordinate and coequal branches of government, each charged with performing particular functions. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 1:55 pm by Amy Howe
When Prelogar responded that they would not, Roberts reminded her of the court’s recent decision in Biden v. [read post]
2 Dec 2006, 6:52 pm
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Hein v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 6:59 am by Steve Vladeck
The Supreme Court has decided exactly one case involving the privilege, and even that decision—in the Watergate tapes case, United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 4:55 am by Sandy
"Because the uncertainty of the state law, the Second Circuit certified the question to the Connecicut Supreme Court.The decision in The Cadle Co. v. [read post]