Search for: "State v. Brothers" Results 841 - 860 of 3,598
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2020, 1:55 pm by Roelke Law, P.A.
At trial, the State presented evidence that when the victim was eight years old and they lived in Arkansas, Appellant took her and one of her brothers on a trip to Florida. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 1:38 pm
The Court held that the Rendine decision permitting attorney fee enhancements remains valid and has not been altered by the United States Supreme Court's decision in Perdue v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 6:53 am
Yesterday's Court of Appeals decision in Latoya Blackman v. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 8:03 am by Venkat
CareFliteAccessing an Employee's Facebook Posts by "Shoulder Surfing" a Coworker's Page States Privacy Claim -- Ehling v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:16 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v SSHD, W & BB v SSHD and Z, G, U & Y v SSHD, heard 30 – 31 January 2012. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 7:25 pm by Douglas Kans
MN Court of Appeals says no refusal to submit to alcohol testing unless officer properly asked the question In a recent Minnesota Court of Appeals ruling, State v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
On the other hand, the Colorado restriction might not survive the application of United States v United Foods, Inc 533 US 405 (2001), where obligations upon fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertisements promoting mushroom sales did not survive Central Hudson scrutiny as mediated through Glickman v Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc 521 US 457 (1997). [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
Notable state judicial review under state constitutions in fact predated the Philadelphia Convention and Marbury v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 5:05 am
Young then left his house with his brother and moments later, five or six shots rang out. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 2:03 pm by Amy Howe
Michael Dreeben, the deputy solicitor general who argued on behalf of the United States, faced a slightly more (but not completely) receptive audience. [read post]