Search for: "State v. C. A."
Results 841 - 860
of 39,788
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2018, 7:37 pm
That the primary thrust of N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4(c) is not to interdict speech, but rather conduct, is reinforced in State v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 9:21 am
Since the Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Murphy v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 3:19 am
State v. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 10:10 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 4:24 am
On 10 December 2018, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) delivered the judgment for the case of Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union (C-621/18), finding that the UK is free to revoke unilaterally the notification of its intention to withdraw from the EU. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 5:01 am
And, based on the CCA opinion in Griffith v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 11:13 am
In this case, the district court held that Section 230(c)(1) immunized the plaintiff’s state law claims. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 5:06 am
Orin Kerr on Volokh Conspiracy:Update on United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 8:28 am
C. [read post]
15 May 2017, 10:32 am
"State of Hawaii, et al. v. [read post]
7 May 2007, 9:17 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 8:56 am
United States and Gould v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 8:35 am
Particular regard was given to the case of Soering v United Kingdom (1989) 11 EHRR 439, where it was held that allowing an extradition of a party to the United States would constitute a violation of that person’s Article 3 rights, as he would be exposed to the risk of the application of the death penalty as a direct consequence of the extradition. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 7:42 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 10:44 am
The marijuana was discovered by police stopped Lewis after he "almost" struck a police car when he pulled his vehicle away from a curb; Lewis was convicted of possession of a controlled dangerous substance, marijuana, in violation of Section 5-601 (c)(2) of the Criminal Law Article, Maryland Code (2002). [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 1:42 pm
Status Spencer v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 4:30 am
*** * In its Stewart decision, the Appellate Division states "Consistent with its statutory purpose, the Sheriff's resort to Civil Service Law §71 was presumably “to secure a steady, reliable, and adequate work force,” (Matter of Duncan v New York State Dev. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 1:19 pm
State. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 2:14 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Radmacher v Granatino [2009] EWCA Civ 649 (02 July 2009) Walkden v Walkden [2009] EWCA Civ 627 (25 June 2009) High Court (Queen’s Bench) C v Dixon [2009] EWHC 708 (QB) (25 June 2009) High Court (Chancery Division) Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Woolf [2009] EWHC B15 (Ch) (19 June 2009) Lindop [...] [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 2:40 pm
C. [read post]
