Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 841 - 860
of 15,314
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR Article 78 to review a determination of the Town terminating the plaintiff [Employee] based on the findings and recommendation of a disciplinary hearing officer, Supreme Court [a] denied the Town's motion to dismiss the Employee petition; [b] granted Employee's petition to the extent of annulling the penalty imposed; and [c] remitting the matter to the Town for the imposition of a less severe penalty. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 7:45 pm
Part of a Public Policy Research Grant by the Hong Kong Chief Executive's Policy Unit, the Workshop provides an opportunity to present the project's interim results for feedback and further development. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
Bar discipline, mostly secret in many states. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 9:00 pm
Supreme Court, Sackett v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 1:53 pm
This is Part V in EFF’s ongoing series about the proposed UN Cybercrime Convention. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 7:54 am
Some courts have even interpreted CAA Sections 175A(d), 182(b), and 172(c)(1) to mean that states seeking redesignation for ozone and PM2.5 must provide for the implementation of reasonably available control measures (RACM) and reasonably available control technology (RACT) —which are applicable to nonattainment areas—in their SIPs (e.g., the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in Wall v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
B. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 2:05 am
Here, the Postal Service suggested either (a) her husband drive her to work in the mornings; (b) that she takes a taxi or an Uber to work; or (c) a combination of (a) and (b). [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 2:14 pm
V. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 1:07 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2023, 11:54 am
” Clubb v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 2:04 pm
Thaler v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
Charlene Cantrell Koonce, Andrew C. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 11:03 am
Other options include Engel & Völkers, HomeEspaña, and SBD Immobles. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 7:00 am
(Particularly following the Supreme Court’s 1983 decision in INS v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:52 pm
Sears v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:50 am
If it meant only that it would be pointless to state it. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 2:34 pm
Then, on 5 May 2022, the landlord’s solicitors wrote to Mr B enclosing a section 21 notice and stating ‘we are advised your deposit was returned to you’. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 10:01 am
The five categories of protected characteristics remain as those stated in the Interim Report, namely: (i) age, (ii) nationality, (iii) sex, marital status, pregnancy status, caregiving responsibilities, (iv) race, religion, language, and (v) disability and mental health conditions. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
This paper is much narrower—Sunstein is really unpacking some of the conservative SCOTUS bloc’s internal debates about the MQD in Biden v. [read post]
