Search for: "State v. Distante" Results 841 - 860 of 923
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
Additionally, the state health officer (a physician) made a statement directed at consumers and retailers (restaurants, grocery stores): “I hope you will purchase irradiated chicken and ground beef as they become available. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am by Bruce Ackerman
They feared it would set a disastrous higher lawmaking precedent: After all, requiring the abolition of poll taxes in federal, but not state, elections represented a relatively minor incursion on state sovereignty. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 8:05 am by Daniel Richardson
  This was dismissed because it repeated much of his state court claims. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:20 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Working Arrangements Across Employment Sectors by Percentage of Workers In their own survey, Barrero et al. measured the full-time working arrangements in the United States as of 2023, identifying the percentage of employees who work fully onsite, fully remote, and those who have a hybrid arrangement. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 1:58 am
  Like many of these cases, the Deutsche Alt-A case was originally filed in state court, and removed by defendants to federal court. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 7:39 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
These were the issues dealt with recently by the New Brunswick Court of Appeal in Diotte v. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
” In a case that came before the highest court in New York State in 1984, People v. [read post]
24 May 2020, 6:27 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Regardless, Justice Smith sought judicial review before the Federal Court in Smith v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 11:00 am by Benjamin Wittes
  That challenge is front and center in Mehanna v. [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 5:32 am
This principle was established by the United States in one of the most dramatic of the post-World War II proceedings, United States v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 6:59 pm
  There may be disagreements over whether an alternative provider of the same service is too distant or not offering quite the same service or otherwise not reasonably available. [read post]