Search for: "State v. Dominic" Results 841 - 860 of 4,504
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2021, 1:42 am by Florian Mueller
In November 2020, the Dusseldorf Regional Court decided to refer to the Luxembourg-based Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) two sets of legal questions: one about the component-level licensing of standard-essential patents (SEPs) and another about the application of the Huawei v. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 7:50 am by Ilya Somin
(Ilya Somin) Virginia was one of several states that enacted a strong eminent domain reform law after the Supreme Court ruled in Kelo v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 9:26 am by Amanda Sanders (UK)
Although the start of 2022 continues to be dominated by the COVID-19 pandemic, it is hoped that 2022 may see the introduction of some of the legislative developments, which were delayed or postponed since 2019. [read post]
  These numbers were dwarfed, however, by the mobile music related revenue of RMB 28.2 billion raked in by the telecom operators, which clearly dominate over the content providers in the burgeoning mobile music market. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 6:45 am by Lawrence Solum
In 1992, despite the fact that the Court was dominated by justices who had been chosen by presidents who had been openly critical of the pro-choice position, these activists had been sorely disappointed by the outcome in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 8:20 am by Ilya Somin
Beginning with the famous case of Bolling v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 4:37 am by Edith Roberts
On Wednesday, the court heard argument in Salman v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am by Rachel Sachs
Holder, the challenge to Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, also dominated the news. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 2:08 pm
Indeed, this is how the Warren Court treated the unenumerated “right to privacy” it first recognized in Griswold v. [read post]
19 Aug 2017, 2:13 pm by Ilya Somin
Mother and daughter on the steps of the Supreme Court soon after it decided Brown v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 5:03 am
That means that other parties will not be hindered in developing technologies which also make use of the same judicial exception.Ariosa Diagnostics v SequenomAriosa Diagnostics, Inc. v Sequenom, Inc., No. 2014-1139 (Fed. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 2:06 am by Adam Wagner
The Court of Appeal dismissed Mr Sugar’s appeal, rejecting the dominant purpose construction and approving the BBC’s primary construction of the designation [23]. [read post]
23 May 2014, 1:40 pm
In part because of Earl Warren’s desire to achieve unanimity, the Brown opinion does not actually overrule Plessy v. [read post]