Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 841 - 860
of 9,082
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2023, 5:00 am
First, the SEC argues Hodl Law has not identified a “case or controversy” between it and the SEC, as required by Article III, section 2 of the United States Constitution. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:16 am
Kelly to transfer the high-profile case to another judicial district. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 5:15 pm
” To be clear, I think the argument distinguishing between judicial invalidation and judicial district-line-drawing is an implausible one on the merits. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:07 pm
Yet, the First District Court of Appeal has had occasion to uphold the use of this exemption twice in just over a year, here in SLD, and earlier in Citizens’ Committee to Complete the Refuge v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 7:45 pm
” United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 3:22 pm
The First District Court of Appeal agreed. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 10:09 am
In South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 8:19 am
Federal Trade Comm’n v. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 8:05 am
See [State Farm Mutual v] Hanania, [261 So. 3d 684] at 687 [Fla. 1st DCA 2018]. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 3:57 pm
In October 2022, the Minnesota District Court denied RCFP’s request to unseal this information, stating that RCFP “does not allege that it has any intent, much less an imminent intent, to access or inspect any of the materials that it seeks to unseal. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 5:01 am
District Court for the Central District of California, who ruled that Eastman had “more likely than not” conspired illegally with Trump to obstruct Congress. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 11:00 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 8:44 am
As previously summarized here, the First District Court of Appeal (Division 5) in Save Berkeley’s Neighborhoods held that the university’s enrollment increases were not statutorily exempt under Public Resources Code section 21080.09, which requires an EIR for long range development plans (“LRDPs”). [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 7:31 am
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 2:59 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 9:31 am
Associates First Capital Corp. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 8:57 am
Co. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 7:57 am
I described then the legal landscape in which their motions to transfer venue are playing out, which is largely set by the District of Columbia Circuit’s binding, en banc 1976 ruling in United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 7:40 am
On November 18, 2022, the Alliance Defending Freedom (“ADF”), a conservative legal group, filed a motion with the federal district court in the Northern District of Texas against the U.S. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 5:01 am
A Court decision [is needed] first. [read post]
