Search for: "State v. German" Results 841 - 860 of 3,001
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2019, 9:19 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
31 Dec 2024, 2:13 am by Söğüt Atilla
Since the last referral to the CJEU, the concept of pastiche has been incorporated into the German copyright law under section 51a UrhG, following the obligations imposed on EU Member States by Article 17(7) of Directive (EU) 2019/790. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 8:36 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
It’s a challenge to our deeply ingrained faith in the state. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 12:24 am
Parasharami, Finality over Choice: Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 11:35 am by John Coyle
This post is by Carlos Manuel Vázquez, a professor of law at Georgetown Law School. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 9:28 am
In Germany the case went up to the Bundesgerichtshof (German Supreme Court), which ruled that the lower courts applied the doctrine of equivalence incorrectly by limiting Lilly’s patent to pemetrexed disodium. [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 12:21 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Dhenne Avocats)
The approach is consistent with both French and German jurisprudence and aligns with the Court of Justice of the EU’s emphasis on mutual trust among Member State courts. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 5:57 am by Florian Mueller
History repeats itself with the Landgericht Düsseldorf (Dusseldorf Regional Court) taking the lead again among German patent infringement courts of first instance on a key standard-essential patent (SEP) licensing question. [read post]
13 May 2015, 3:09 am
This, together with other two questions, is what the Bundesgerichtshof (German Federal Court of Justice) asked [here] our beloved Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) to clarify in Dimensione Direct Sales srl and Michele Labianca v Knoll International SpA, C-516/13.This morning the CJEU issued its 36-paragraph decision, ruling that the right of distribution encompasses the right to prevent "an offer for sale or a targeted advertisement of the… [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by James Maxeiner
To the relief of many, last year in Turner v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:03 am by Kevin LaCroix
 For good measure, however, the court noted Quail Cruises Ship Mgmt. v. [read post]