Search for: "State v. Gordon" Results 841 - 860 of 1,392
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2022, 6:16 am by Ezequiel Heffes
State and non-State fighters are indeed human beings, which makes it difficult to exclude an emotional component when assessing their respect for any legal regime [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, the government may still be liable for Theresa=s negligence under the FTCA (28 USC 1346 [b]; Haskin, 569 Fed Appx 12; Esgrance v United States, US Dist Ct, SD NY, 17 Civ 8352, Oetken, J., 2018; Jappa v PJR Const. [read post]
14 Oct 2024, 2:50 am by INFORRM
Vardy argued that Rooney had deliberately understated her legal costs, however Judge Gordon-Saker found that “on balance and, I have to say, only just” Rooney’s legal team had not committed misconduct. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 6:01 am
Buono, United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 9:44 am by Chinmayi Sharma
He stated during his deposition that he will be resigning from his position imminently—though, he stated, due to circumstances unrelated to his presence before Congress. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 3:31 pm by Joe Mullin
And if "generally stated views regarding the law" are enough to disqualify judges from cases, the brief notes, judges are likely be discouraged from teaching at law schools.Previous coverage of Association for Molecular Pathology, et al. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 5:15 am
Hance, Jr. 164,625 161,730 — — — 330,535 V. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 6:29 am by David Post
The plurality of four refused to revisit the Slaughter-House Cases (1873) or United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2024, 1:35 pm by Eugene Volokh
Gordon, No. 20-CV-01707-JST, 2020 WL 10963944, at *2-5 (N.D. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 8:04 am
Virginia Matthews also stated in voir dire that she did not use Facebook. [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 7:01 am by Anushka Limaye
  Meanwhile, Brenna Gautam and Julia Solomon-Strauss provided us with a detailed breakdown of last week’s military commissions hearings in United States v. [read post]