Search for: "State v. Holder"
Results 841 - 860
of 8,247
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2022, 6:48 am
Substantial evidence supported the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s finding that another company, and not the trademark holder, actually used the mark in commerce. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 2:54 pm
Co. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:17 am
The FTC states that the Holder Rule does not eliminate any rights that a consumer may have as a matter of separate state or federal law. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 5:32 am
In the past, when spouses have gone to court to try to force the stock option holder to exercise the option, the court has refused. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 8:44 am
The cases are Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 7:31 am
Venkatraman, V., et al. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 6:35 am
Haier I and Sisvel v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 12:04 pm
Circuit action has taken place in the case of Trump v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Findings of fact failed to resolve material conflicts in the evidence from suppression hearing; denial of motion to suppress vacated and remanded for new findings State v. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 10:35 pm
Tex. and unsuccessfully appealed by Ericsson's adversary in that case, HTC, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 9:53 am
The solicitation was issued to holders of the NASA SEWP V GWAC. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 6:01 am
"] From Judge Stephanie Gallagher's opinion Thursday in Cottman v. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 10:11 pm
Ford and Acer v. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 10:17 am
” Laitram Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 8:24 am
Holder (2009).) [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 8:43 pm
We're very close now to the InterDigital v. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 1:28 am
This writer is woefully behind the times in writing about this decision, but it does merit belated discussion and is a very important decision to keep in mind in relation to intermediaries.The case of Frank Peterson v Google LLC (along with another case; Elsevier v Cyando) concerns Nemo Studio, a company owned by Mr Peterson who is a music producer. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 1:28 am
This writer is woefully behind the times in writing about this decision, but it does merit belated discussion and is a very important decision to keep in mind in relation to intermediaries.The case of Frank Peterson v Google LLC (along with another case; Elsevier v Cyando) concerns Nemo Studio, a company owned by Mr Peterson who is a music producer. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 5:38 pm
The closest constitutional challenge to the PTAB was probably in United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 2:15 pm
” (…) Glaser Weil’s argument focused on MDQ, LLC v. [read post]
