Search for: "State v. Holland" Results 841 - 860 of 944
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2022, 6:06 am by Clara Apt
Climate Change and the Courts Greenhouse Gaslighting: Deceptive Moderation and West Virginia v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 3:18 pm by Gene Quinn
On April 1, 2010, Judge Terry Means of the United States Federal District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued a ruling in Highmark, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 12:00 am
Again, in Merck v Stephar [(1982) F.S.R. 57], the parallel importer (Stephar) was benefitted by the importation of the drug ("Moduretic") from Italy into Holland. [read post]
30 May 2012, 3:00 am by Steve Lombardi
Co., 653 N.W.2d 323, 331 (Iowa 2002) (stating injury “must be related to the working environment or the conditions of employment”); Griffith v. [read post]
6 Feb 2021, 4:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Symposium on Mary Ziegler, Abortion and the Law in America: Roe v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 3:23 pm by Bexis
  Id.To get around TwIqbal, the plaintiffs in Ali trotted out Hofts v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 1:04 am
More than most novice justices, Alito has taken bullets for business in the term just ended, most notably for his controversial majority opinion in Ledbetter v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:07 am by Eleonora Rosati
Standard International Management v EUIPO Case T-768/20 EU General Court (July 2022)Can a hotel in the United States use an EU trade mark? [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 4:04 am
That question was recently put to the test in the case of McKesson Information Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 8:40 am
Eggers, III of Holland & Hart, LLP, Cheyenne, Wyoming. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 1:43 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Dhenne Avocats)
However, the French Judge refers to a statement made by Judge Holland, which nuances this “binary” conclusion on the strict distinction between companies, stating that in certain hypotheses, the law of the State of Delaware (in which both BMS Pharma and BMS Company are incorporated) allows “the corporate veil to be lifted”, which results from an attestation, and is confirmed by Judge Chandler’s testimony. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am by Bruce Ackerman
Indeed, Holland and other leading Southerners made the Twenty-Fourth Amendment central to their constitutional case against the Voting Rights Act of 1965 – arguing that some of its sweeping provisions, most notably a ban on poll taxes in state and local elections, were unconstitutional without the enactment of another formal amendment. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 6:07 pm
(Stanford University)Alexis Marcus (Northwestern University)Alvarez Fernando (University of Chicago)Andersen Torben (Northwestern University)Baliga Sandeep (Northwestern University)Banerjee Abhijit V. [read post]