Search for: "State v. London"
Results 841 - 860
of 3,557
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2016, 3:47 am
The substantial truth of this allegation was not affected by the BBC having inaccurately stated that the claimant made such a statement at East London Mosque. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 6:28 am
” Lawson v. [read post]
5 May 2025, 11:34 am
Central London County Court. 28 April 2025 (Unreported. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 12:00 am
In Kelo v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
V. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm
Where a state breaches the ECHR, a Court set up by signatory members – the European Court of Human Rights (which has nothing to do with the European Union) – can order a state to pay an aggrieved citizen compensation. [read post]
12 May 2010, 10:21 am
Ahmed & Ors v Murphy [2010] EWHC 453 (Admin) This was an appeal to the High Court of a decision by the London Rent Assessment Committee (LRAC) that the maximum fair rent payable by Mr Murphy for the flat in Brick Lane, Spitalfields was £8.50 per week. [read post]
12 May 2010, 10:21 am
Ahmed & Ors v Murphy [2010] EWHC 453 (Admin) This was an appeal to the High Court of a decision by the London Rent Assessment Committee (LRAC) that the maximum fair rent payable by Mr Murphy for the flat in Brick Lane, Spitalfields was £8.50 per week. [read post]
4 May 2019, 12:39 pm
See Hay v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 5:09 am
In balancing these two rights, Tugendhat J had in mind the “ultimate balancing test” as referred to by Lord Steyn Re S (A Child) [2005] 1 AC 593 (at para 17) and guidance from Lord Bingham in R v Shayler [2003] 1 AC 247 (at para 26) that interference of the ECHR right must not be stricter than necessary to achieve the state’s legitimate aim. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 1:37 am
R (SG & Ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions,heard 29-30 April. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:26 am
The first is Lucia v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
If that were the intention, one would have expected it to have been stated expressly. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
If that were the intention, one would have expected it to have been stated expressly. [read post]
11 May 2012, 2:19 am
But not everything a politician says is political (see Livingstone v Adjudication Panel for England [2006] EWHC 2533 (Admin) [36] where it was judged that the then-London mayor Ken Livingstone’s comments were not expressing political opinion, but were instead to be seen as simply as the offensive abuse of a journalist). [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 9:34 am
See Narducci v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 6:00 am
Blue Whale Corp. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 2:24 pm
In case you were wondering, they were Margot Fröhlinger, Director, DG Internal Market and Services, European Commission, Brussels Dr Klaus Grabinski, Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) Karlsruhe Professor Sir Robin Jacob, University College London Marcin Korolec, Undersecretary of State, Ministry of Economy, Warsaw Eurico Marques dos Reis, Judge of the Court of Appeal, Lisbon Kevin Mooney, Partner and Head of Intellectual Property, Simmons & Simmons,… [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 10:24 am
The case of the day is Constellation Energy Commodities Group Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 10:16 pm
At the end ofthe post, we stated that we were not convinced by the reasoning in the judgement. [read post]
