Search for: "State v. London"
Results 841 - 860
of 3,575
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2013, 10:36 am
This member of the IPKat team attended the Consultation Event on the current draft of the Rules of Procedure of the Unified Patent Court that took place yesterday (3 September 2013) in London in the lovely offices of Bristows. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 6:00 pm
In the former case the accuseds’ appeal to London was unsuccessful. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 12:45 pm
’ In Macaluso v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 10:49 am
R(Cort) v London Borough of Lambeth (2022) EWHC 1085 (Admin) While in some ways this is a decision on an historic context (hopefully), there is a lot in this judgment on local authority approaches to housing in a public health emergency to consider. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
Mr Terluk said he was from Kazakhstan and that he was seeking asylum in London. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 6:48 am
C v D [2007] EWCA Civ 1282). [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:26 am
The first is Lucia v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 5:09 am
In balancing these two rights, Tugendhat J had in mind the “ultimate balancing test” as referred to by Lord Steyn Re S (A Child) [2005] 1 AC 593 (at para 17) and guidance from Lord Bingham in R v Shayler [2003] 1 AC 247 (at para 26) that interference of the ECHR right must not be stricter than necessary to achieve the state’s legitimate aim. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 1:37 am
R (SG & Ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions,heard 29-30 April. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 10:17 am
It was a very significant case concerning allegations of genocide by one state against another. [read post]
11 May 2012, 2:19 am
But not everything a politician says is political (see Livingstone v Adjudication Panel for England [2006] EWHC 2533 (Admin) [36] where it was judged that the then-London mayor Ken Livingstone’s comments were not expressing political opinion, but were instead to be seen as simply as the offensive abuse of a journalist). [read post]
12 May 2010, 10:21 am
Ahmed & Ors v Murphy [2010] EWHC 453 (Admin) This was an appeal to the High Court of a decision by the London Rent Assessment Committee (LRAC) that the maximum fair rent payable by Mr Murphy for the flat in Brick Lane, Spitalfields was £8.50 per week. [read post]
12 May 2010, 10:21 am
Ahmed & Ors v Murphy [2010] EWHC 453 (Admin) This was an appeal to the High Court of a decision by the London Rent Assessment Committee (LRAC) that the maximum fair rent payable by Mr Murphy for the flat in Brick Lane, Spitalfields was £8.50 per week. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 4:06 pm
City of New London. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
If that were the intention, one would have expected it to have been stated expressly. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
If that were the intention, one would have expected it to have been stated expressly. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 12:50 am
The shipowners issued bills of lading which were stated to incorporate the terms of the voyage charterparty. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:15 pm
United States and Ashcroft v. al-Kidd (used with permission, www.courtartist.com) How should citizens in a republic bound by the rule of law regard the pretextual use of law by state officials? [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:57 pm
Master Bell stated that he “thought long and hard about whether or not to strike out Ms O’Neill’s action in the light of this jurisprudence and came close to doing so” [46]. [read post]
