Search for: "State v. Lord" Results 841 - 860 of 3,605
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2015, 3:08 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In giving the lead judgment Lord Toulson stated that the judgment of the Court of Appeal itself contained a ruling that the Council acted unlawfully and the authority of its judgment would be no greater or less by making or not making a declaration in the form of the order to the same effect. [read post]
13 May 2011, 4:16 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) K v L [2011] EWCA Civ 550 (13 May 2011) AXA Sunlife Services Plc v Campbell Martin Ltd & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 549 (12 May 2011) BDW Trading Ltd (t/a Barratt North London) v JM Rowe (Investments) Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 548 (12 May 2011) AP (Trinidad & Tobago) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 551 (12 May 2011) Kennedy v The Information Commissioner & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 367… [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 10:22 am
The Court of Appeal, in overturning Mr Justice Birss' decision, found the patent invalid for lack of inventive step (Actavis v ICOS [2017] EWCA Civ 1671). [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 5:30 am by INFORRM
Lord Lester’s Defamation Bill, which is to receive a Second Reading in the House of Lords this Friday, seeks to address these concerns by revising many elements of the law of libel. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:22 am
Arnold J considered the criteria set down by the Court of Appeal in Novartis v Hospira [2013], but noted that it was of concern that Lord Hoffman’s judgment in the Privy Council case National Commercial Bank Jamaica v Olint [2009] had not been cited. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 8:53 am
YouTube: From House of Lords to Supreme Court Parliament News: From House of Lords to Supreme Court Further information Parliament News: Work of the Law Lords Judicial Work Judicial Business House of Lords judgments About Parliament: Judgments About Parliament: Law Lords Briefing: Judicial work of the House of Lords (PDF) [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Byndloss) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15-16 February 2017. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 12:42 pm by Nicholas Gibson, Matrix.
The Court of Appeal rejected the argument of the Secretary of the State that Parliament by the 2007 Act had taken a policy decision to place the Upper Tribunal wholly beyond the reach of judicial review. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 2:46 am by ANDREW BODNAR, MATRIX
Analysis On its own this decision once again concludes the arguments about postponement of confiscation proceedings, but it should be read in the light of the decisions in R v Waya [2012] UIKSC 51, R v Ahmad, R v Fields [2014] UKSC 36 and R v Harvey [2015] UKSC 73. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 8:31 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
On Monday 26 March 2012 are the appeals from the Supreme Court of Mauritius of Dookee  v The State of Mauritius and anor and Sakoor Patel and ors v Anandsing Beenessreesing and Sicom Ltd. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 6:50 pm
Lord Justice Scott Baker at para 36, states In my judgment the law is clear. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 12:43 am by ASAD KHAN
Indeed, during the hearing of these cases, even Lord Carnwath was incredibly dismissive about the submission that the earlier article 8 status quo remains intact in its origi [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 2:06 am by Charlotte Bamford, Olswang LLP
Lord Toulson stated that denying Mr Hunt his costs and ordering him to pay the other party’s costs could be a serious public interest issue. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 1:14 am
The case of Baillie Estates Ltd v Du Pont (UK) Ltd helps to elucidate some of these questions. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am by INFORRM
As Inforrm noted here, in a post examining the detail of the Amendments, there were 16 Lords Amendments. [read post]