Search for: "State v. Mann"
Results 841 - 860
of 876
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2020, 12:08 pm
Ba ba ba, bye BabybelFromageries Bel v J Sainsbury Plc [2019] EWHC 3454 (December 2019)Fact of the day: I don’t like cheese (you could say I’m not fondue it). [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 12:22 pm
In particular, public wrath is displayed against those who would challenge "age of consent" laws, which are higher in the United States (now effectively 18 in all states due to Federal statutes) than in most other societies. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 7:32 am
Case citation: Milo & Gabby, LLC v. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 9:24 pm
And pretty closely related to Thomas Ruffin's State v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 11:57 pm
Freis v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 7:24 pm
Adopting the Illinois Supreme Court's reasoning in 2314 Lincoln Park West Condominium Association v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:44 am
There’s also a useful “tl;dr” explainer by Sam Bowman and Geoff Manne (here). [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 9:01 pm
Most recently, Orenstein and Mann wrote: “The two of us have each been immersed in Washington politics and policymaking for more than 43 years—and we have never seen [a Congress] this dysfunctional. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 6:24 am
Circuit’s subsequent decision in Rambus Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:43 am
Porro v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:47 pm
” A recent, interesting discussion on X (the platform formerly known as Twitter), involving Geoff Manne, Herb Hovenkamp, Steve Salop, and others illustrated some of the complexity in implementation. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 10:00 am
Stigler assumes the underlying goods are neither substitutes nor complements: Stigler, George J. (1963) “United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 9:56 pm
" After Roe v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 4:56 am
While put rights generally are a strong exit mechanism, GMX Technologies v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
I think it is somewhat telling that Jennifer’s caution leads her to try to ask if there are any real defenses for what I find one of the truly indefensible features of the Constitution—the allocation in the Senate of equal voting power by states. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm
See Schulz v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:36 am
Hitchcock and Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am
Michael Mabry stated the following in his declaration: “We havenever been contacted by Aurora nor [sic] any of its agents in person, by telephone or byfirst class mail to explore options for us to avoid foreclosure as required in CC § 2923.5. [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
He relegates to a single brief mention the Supreme Court’s summary affirmance in Bluman v. [read post]
