Search for: "State v. Mark" Results 841 - 860 of 19,778
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2015, 3:26 am
 it may — depending on the specific mark which is described as enjoying a reputation and, accordingly, on the public concerned — be sufficient that a Community trade mark enjoys a reputation in one Member State, which does not need to be the State in which that provision is relied upon. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 12:52 am
It must be for the applicant to state clearly the type of monopoly for which he contends. [read post]
21 May 2010, 3:19 am
The problem, stated at its most general, is simple. [read post]
21 May 2019, 5:23 am by ASAD KHAN
Sarmiento and Sharpston view Zambrano (C-34/09, EU:C:2011:124), which caused a stir because of the substance of rights test, as a “high-water mark” in the CJEU’s jurisprudence. [read post]
7 May 2008, 12:37 pm
The season ended with a particularly interesting argument in United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 6:21 am by Riana Harvey
The GC also stated that Tulliallan could rely on the protection of earlier mark’s reputation for all of the services covered by earlier marks in Class 35. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:17 pm by Rachael Hanna
Mark Martins, authorizing Khan to use the laptop for “rehabilitative purposes. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 6:35 pm by Jim Chen
In a forum that has taken pains to praise United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 12:19 pm by Robert C. Lehrman
The case is called Nowrouzi et. al. v. [read post]