Search for: "State v. Oxford"
Results 841 - 860
of 1,741
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2022, 11:43 pm
As we noted in an earlier post, however, in Dean Martyn Percy v The Dean & Chapter of the Cathedral Church of Christ in Oxford of the Foundation of King Henry VIII [2020] UKET 3310878/2019, Employment Judge Andrew Clarke QC concluded at a preliminary hearing that Dean Percy was an employee for the purposes of s. 83(2)(a) of the Equality Act 2010, though not an employee of the Crown. [read post]
5 Mar 2022, 2:58 am
Jesus College, Oxford 1-12 August 2022. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 4:06 pm
A v British Broadcasting Corporation, 22 and 23 January 2014 (Supreme Court) Ontulmus v Collett 5 and 6 February 2014 (Tugendhat J) NAB v Serco, 7 February 2014 (Bean J) [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 am
Events On Professor Sandra Wachter of the Oxford Internet Institute will be delivering a lecture on ‘How AI disrupts the Law’ at Gresham College. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
On the same day, there were hearings on applications for injunctions in the cases of Payone v Logo and Searl v Dimova-Handley. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 4:17 pm
Data Privacy and Data Protection On 26 May 2021 the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in R (Open Rights Group) v Secretary of State for Home Department [2021] EWCA Civ 800. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 8:21 am
Insofar as Mostyn J had previously determined otherwise in cases such as DL v SL [2015] EWHC 2621 (Fam); [2016] 1 WLR 1259 and Appleton v Gallagher, he was wrong: Gallagher at [33]-[34]. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 4:25 am
Given the [*2]absence of detailed facts, the legal malpractice cause of action should have been dismissed (see Janker v Silver, Forrester & Lesser, P.C., 135 AD3d 908, 910 [2016]; Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, 126 AD3d at 1185-1186; Kreamer v Town of Oxford, 96 AD3d 1128, 1128 [2012]; compare Soule v Lozada, 232 AD2d 825, 825 [1996]). [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:45 am
Tamburo v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 5:52 am
Denezpi v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 5:38 am
Dagenhart and United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 4:18 pm
United States In the case of Simorangkir v Courtney Love Cobain the Court of Appeal of the State of California dismissed an appeal by Courtney Love seeking to have the case dismissed under California’s anti-SLAPP statute. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm
Peter Odili, at the state High Court, Port Harcourt. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm
Sporrong [Sporrong and Lönnroth v Sweden (1983) 5 EHRR 35] itself) that the presence or absence of compensation is not a separate issue, but is an important element in deciding whether, in authorising the interference in the general interest, the balance struck by the state is fair. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 2:32 pm
Amant v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm
Sporrong [Sporrong and Lönnroth v Sweden (1983) 5 EHRR 35] itself) that the presence or absence of compensation is not a separate issue, but is an important element in deciding whether, in authorising the interference in the general interest, the balance struck by the state is fair. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 3:52 am
Jesus College, Oxford 1-12 August 2022. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 12:20 am
Akpan v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 11:24 pm
By this time the husband had left banking and had embarked on research studies at Oxford. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 12:40 am
In its much awaited judgment in the Delhi University photocopying case (The Chancellor Masters and Scholars of the University of Oxford v. [read post]
