Search for: "State v. Plain"
Results 841 - 860
of 11,761
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Dec 2007, 9:44 pm
State v. [read post]
3 Sep 2004, 1:53 pm
In United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 2:45 pm
State, 394 Md. 184, 201 (2006); see Harrison v. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 2:28 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 1:02 pm
Commentors here have done a great job highlighting the practical craziness of the Fifth Circuit's adoption of a "plain error" approach to reasonableness review in US v. [read post]
4 Nov 2004, 3:22 am
See United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 12:54 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 10:07 am
Burwell in Plain English. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 3:22 am
In USA Today, Richard Wolf previews Monday’s oral arguments in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 2:13 pm
In the case of State of Minnesota v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 2:13 pm
In the case of State of Minnesota v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 6:54 am
On Tuesday in Greene v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 4:04 am
Alleged violations of a "Memorandum of Understanding" to a Taylor Law agreement may not be subject to contract grievance proceduresPine Plains CSD v Federation of Teachers, 248 A.D.2d 612It is not unusual for parties to a collective bargaining agreement to agree to provisions set out in a “supplemental agreement” or to sign a “memorandum of understanding” in the course of collective bargaining pursuant to the Taylor Law.Typically this device is… [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 10:44 am
JURY INSTRUCTIONUnited States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 1:31 pm
The First District's recent decision in People v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 2:07 pm
The Court ruled that states cannot be sued for monetary damages for violating the FMLA’s medical leave provision, leaving state workers with little meaningful recourse if their employers deny the self-care leave guaranteed by the plain language of the FMLA. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 1:52 pm
State v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 3:45 am
Finally, in State v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 1:01 pm
It said that United States v. [read post]
