Search for: "State v. Price"
Results 841 - 860
of 13,185
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2016, 7:02 am
In Birch v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
In referring to the recent TCL v Ericsson decision from the Central District of California (see Kat post here), Judge Labson stated:"The Court is not persuaded by Plaintiffs’ argument that summary judgment on Count III of the FAC is warranted. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
We are examining the recent decision by the Delaware Supreme Court in Gantler v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 12:00 am
In Friedman v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 11:33 am
§ 230 in the lower federal and state courts. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 5:56 pm
See, e.g., United States ex rel. [read post]
11 Sep 2021, 9:53 am
Here's a follow-up to my commentary on the Epic Games v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 6:36 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 6:36 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:00 am
U-Haul and Hall v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 9:13 am
The state-law claims that remained after the dismissal of the price-fixing claims conferred neither advantage, the district court believed. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 8:12 am
To set the stage, Epic v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 9:18 am
SUBTITLE: How the Case of Boy Scouts of America v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 9:31 pm
TITLE: Three Generations, No Imbeciles SUBTITLE: Eugenics, the Supreme Court, and Buck v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:00 am
Harris v. [read post]
22 Sep 2007, 7:23 pm
In a move that likely fell under most radars, the Appellate Division, 2d Department has granted the defendant's motion for leave to appeal their decision in Fair Price Medical Supply Corp. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 2:28 pm
Today’s Supreme Court opinion in Price v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 10:55 am
State Farm), that means prices will rise to cover risks like the Broussards. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 2:31 pm
” United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 4:45 am
The case will decide the extent to which state courts can override freedom of contract by permitting consumers to negotiate for a lower price in exchange for a promise that they won't bring a class action—an expensive and clumsy procedural device that all too often does nothing other than transfer wealth from consumers and businesses to attorneys. [read post]
