Search for: "State v. Price" Results 841 - 860 of 11,975
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2011, 1:45 am by Matthew Ryder QC, Matrix
In the last two years the Supreme Court has grappled with this conundrum in various ways: in relation to control orders; allegations of terrorist financing (SSHD v AF [2009] UKHL 28); compensation for those who have suffered miscarriage of justice (R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18); and criminal conduct as the subject of disciplinary proceedings (R (G) v The Governors of X School [2011] UKSC 30). [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 10:47 am
I can't think of a less sympathetic non-criminal case than this one.The Cheungs get indicted for conspiracy to defraud the United States and tax fraud. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 8:28 am by John Jascob
At issue is whether a defendant in a securities class action may rebut the presumption of classwide reliance recognized in Basic Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
Pribetic for bringing to light the case of the day, Third Point LLC v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 8:10 am by A. Hunter Faulkner, Esq.
Recently, a federal jury in the Middle District of Missouri found the National Association of Realtors (“NAR”) and two major real estate brokerages—Keller Willams and HomeServices of America—liable under United States antitrust laws for conspiring to fix prices in the class action lawsuit, Burnett v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 1:05 am by HAZEL WRIGHT, HUNTERS SOLICITORS
That often means the person who moves out has to rent rather than buy a new home and rental prices are even beating house price increases in many areas, particularly London and the South East. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 3:01 pm by John Jascob
When the truth came to light, according to the complaint, the company’s stock price fell by 71 percent (McDermid v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 5:31 pm by Adam Baker
The Ontario Court of Appeal had relied on its decision in Belle River Community Arena Inc. v W.J.C. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
"Judge Price concurred, along with Judge Johnson and Judge Holcomb. [read post]