Search for: "State v. R. G." Results 841 - 860 of 4,530
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2010, 1:20 pm by Meg Martin
Renneisen, Deputy Attorney General; Theodore R. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
 R (2000) 7 on the right of journalists not to disclose their sources of information, adopted by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on 8 March 2000. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 4:15 am
Probationary employee challenging his or her termination must show bad faith or an improper or impermissible reason underlies the terminationMatter of Mathis v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 2011 NY Slip Op 01190, Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentProbationary correction officer Demar Mathis filed an Article 78 petition challenging his termination from his employment for “failure to complete his probationary period in a satisfactory manner. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 3:07 am
Challenging a disciplinary penaltyMantione v Levin, 277 AD2d 952Ever wonder why some disciplinary action appeals are transferred to the Appellate Division by a State Supreme Court Judge? [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 6:22 am by Dennis Crouch
The Enlarged Board held that this question should be answered in the affirmative provided that there was a new technical effect, see also UK decision Activis v Merck [2008] EWCA Civ. 444 and German decision X ZR 236/01 Carvedilol II, 19 December 2006. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 12:28 am by Laura Sandwell
R (HS2 Action Alliance Ltd) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor, R (Heathrow Hub Limited & Anor) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor, and R (Buckinghamshire County Council & Ors) v The Secretary of State for Transport, heard 15 – 16 October 2013. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 11:46 pm by Matthew Hill
R v M(L) and others [2010] EWCA Crim 2327; [2010] WLR(D) 266 – Read judgment The Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) has provided further guidance to prosecutors on whether or not they should bring charges against victims of human trafficking who go on to commit crimes. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 R v Hilton (Northern Ireland), heard 2 December 2019 MacDonald &… [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 1:20 am by Matthias Weller
The sales contract was signed on 14 June 1935 by the dealers and the bank, acting on behalf of the State of Prussia whose Prime Minister was Hermann Göring at the time. [read post]